Why Didn't Mueller Investigate the strange murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich ?

The quick and obvious answer

is that Mueller's 18 angry Democrats

investigated ONLY Republicans,

and Seth Rich was a Democrat.

Very Interesting:
The Seth Rich 
memorial bike rack 
and plaque 

outside Democrat
national Committee
headquarters:

Rich was a young Democrat 

who worked for the 

Democrat National Committee.

Rich was murdered 

in the middle of the night 

on the streets of 

Washington DC. 

His valuables were

not taken.

He died more than 

one hour after being shot.

It's claimed that he talked

to police before he died,

but whatever he said seems

to be a state secret.

Seth Rich murder scene:

Julian Assange of WikiLeaks

claimed the DNC e-mails

he leaked were handed to

an associate, on a flash drive,

in the Washington DC area.

After Rich was murdered, 

Assange talked about offering 

a five-figure award for

information that would

lead to an arrest.

Since Assange and WikiLeaks

had a consistent history 

of never revealing sources, 

I took his interference as 

evidence to mean Seth Rich 

was NOT the DNC insider

involved with WikiLeaks.

Perhaps Assange 

brought up Rich's name

to confuse people who

may have suspected 

another DNC insider.

At this point, I'm not sure

about Seth Rich, except for

a surprising lack of interest

in solving his murder.

I am confident, 

and have written

here many times, 

that the WikiLeaks claim 

they did NOT receive

hacked DNC e-mails 

from Russians,

has NOT been refuted.

It remains very suspicious 

that the Obama FBI was never 

allowed to examine DNC computers

and servers ... and that a private

company, CrowdStrike, headed

by ex-Russians who hated Putin,

blamed Russia for DNC hacks

after one day on the job.

Note:
CrowdStrike went public with an IPO,
and started trading on June 12, 2019.

Mueller simply accepted 

CrowdStrike's

Russian hacking claim, 

without any questions.

Remember:

The Russia hacking claim 

was immediately weaponized 

by the Hillary Clinton campaign, 

as evidence that Donald Trump 

was favored by the Russians, 

and in collusion with them too.

In reality, Russian disinformation

used for the Fusion GPS 

Christopher Steele Dossier,

paid for by Hillary Clinton,

was, by far, the most effective

Russian interference in the 

2016 election.

So, of course, Mueller 

did NOT investigate 

the content of the 

Steele Dossier.

No one seems to know
who killed Seth Rich

in Washington, D.C., 
on July 10, 2016.  

All we know is that he was found 

at 4:19 a.m. in the Bloomingdale 

neighborhood “with apparent 
gunshot wound(s) to the back” 
according to the police report.  

Conscious and still breathing, 
Rich was rushed to a nearby hospital 

where he was pronounced dead at 5:57.

Police released little information.

Rich’s mother, Mary,

told local TV news 

that her son struggled 

with his assailants: 

“His hands were bruised, 

his knees are bruised, 

his face is bruised, 

and yet he had two shots 

to his back, and yet

 they never took anything 

… They took his life

for literally no reason.  

They didn’t finish robbing him, 

they just took his life.” 

Cops said shortly 

after the killing that they 

had no immediate indication 

that robbery was a motive.  

All the local medical examiner 

would say is that the cause 

of death was a gunshot wound 

to the torso.  

According to Rich’s brother, Aaron, 

Seth “was very aware, very talkative,” 

when police found him lying 

on the pavement. 

Yet cops have refused to say

if he described his assailant.  

A month later, cops
put out a statement that: 

“there is no indication that 

Seth Rich’s death is connected 

to his employment at the DNC,” 

but refused to elaborate.

Craig Murray, the ex-British diplomat 

who serves as an unofficial WikiLeaks 

spokesman, says Mueller’s team 

made no effort to contact him, 

even though he has publicly stated 

that he met clandestinely 

with an associate of the leaker 

near the American University 

campus in Washington.

Mueller obviously didn’t want anything 

that might disturb his favored assumption, 

that Russian hackers are the guilty party. 

Robert Mueller is 'certain'

that the Rich murder 
had nothing to do with e-mails,

just as he was 'certain' in 2003 

that Iraq was bristling with 

weapons of mass destruction: 

“posing a clear threat 

to our national security". 

Mueller is equally 'certain',

that merely by expressing concern 

that the murder may have had 

something to do with the release 

of thousands of DNC emails 

less than two weeks later, 

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange 

was trying to protect the real source, 

which of course is "Russia".

From the Mueller report":

“Beginning in the summer of 2016, Assange and WikiLeaks made a number of statements about Seth Rich, a former DNC staff member who was killed in July 2016.  

The statements about Rich implied falsely that he had been the source of the stolen DNC emails.  

On August 9, 2016, the @WikiLeaks Twitter accounted posted: 

‘ANNOUNCE: WikiLeaks has decided to issue a US$20k reward for information leading to conviction for the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.’ 

There’s nothing in the Mueller Report 

indicating that the special counselor 

independently reviewed the 

forensic evidence, or questioned

Rich's family members and friends.  

Mueller also didn’t interview Assange, 

the person in the best position 

to know who supplied the data, 

even though Craig Murray, 

the ex-British diplomat who serves 

as an unofficial WikiLeaks spokesman, 

says the WikiLeaks founder 

would have been “very willing

 to give evidence to Mueller” 

while holed up in the Ecuadorian 

embassy in London, 

“which could have been done 

by video-link, by interview 

in the Embassy, 

or by written communication.” 

Craig Murray told 

the Libertarian Institute’s

Scott Horton: 

“Don’t get me wrong, 

I’m not saying that he [Rich] 

was the source of the leaks.  

What I’m saying is that 

it’s probably not an unfair

 indication to draw that WikiLeaks 

believe[s] that he may have 

been killed by someone 

who thought he was the 

source of the leaks.”  

If the DNC email disclosure 

was a computer hack,

then Rich had nothing to do with it, 

which means his death 

was a robbery gone wrong.  

But if it was a DNC insider leak, 
not a hack,

the story is more complicated. 

Mueller’s account of how Russian 

intelligence supposedly supplied

WikiLeaks with stolen data 

makes no sense because, 

according to the report’s 

chronology,

the transfer left WikiLeaks 

with just four days to review 

some 28,000 emails and 

other electronic documents 

to make sure that they 

were genuine and unaltered. 

I apologize for a story

which does not have a 

conclusion --

the story was about 

an apparent lack of interest

in finding a conclusion !