Sunday, June 9, 2019

ROBERT MUELLER'S DISAPPOINTING RECORD AT THE FBI

During his 11 years as Director 
of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, 
Mueller’s agency routinely violated 
federal law ,and the Bill of Rights.

Mueller took over the FBI 
one week before the 9/11 attacks.

On Sept. 17, 2011, Mueller declared:
“There were no warning signs 
that I’m aware of that would indicate 
this type of operation in the country.” 

This claim helped 
the Bush Administration 
get the Patriot Act passed, 
vastly expanding the FBI’s 
ability to capture Americans’ 
personal information.

Mueller his the fact (until the following May)
that FBI agents in Phoenix and Minneapolis 
had warned FBI headquarters of suspicious 
Arabs in flight training programs prior to 9/11. 

A House-Senate Joint 
Intelligence Committee analysis 
concluded that FBI incompetence 
and negligence “contributed to the 
United States becoming, in effect, 
a sanctuary for radical terrorists.”.

The Wall Street Journal called for 
Mueller’s resignation, while a 
New York Times headline warned: 
“Lawmakers Say Misstatements 
Cloud F.B.I. Chief's Credibility.”

The Patriot act allowed the FBI 
to increase by a hundredfold
 — up to 50,000 a year — 
the number of National Security 
Letters (NSLs) it issued to citizens, 
business, and nonprofit organizations 
-- recipients were prohibited 
from disclosing that their data 
had been raided. 

NSLs entitle the FBI
to seize records 
that reveal: 
“where a person makes 
and spends money, with whom he lives 
and lived before, how much he gambles, 
what he buys online, what he pawns 
and borrows, where he travels, 
how he invests, what he searches for 
and reads on the Web, and who telephones
or e-mails him at home and at work,” 
the Washington Post noted. 

The FBI can spy on thousands of people’s 
records with a single NSL — regardless of
the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition 
of unreasonable warrantless searches.

The FBI greatly understated the number 
of NSLs it was issuing and denied abuses, 
helping sway Congress to renew the 
Patriot Act in 2006. 

The following year, 
an Inspector General report 
revealed that FBI agents 
may have recklessly issued 
thousands of illegal NSLs.  

Shortly after that report was released, 
federal judge Victor Marrero denounced 
the NSL process as “the legislative 
equivalent of breaking and entering, 
with an ominous free pass to the 
hijacking of constitutional values."

Rather than arresting FBI agents 
who broke the law, Mueller created 
a new FBI Office of Integrity 
and Compliance.  

The Electronic Freedom Foundation, 
after winning lawsuits to garner FBI reports 
to a federal oversight board, concluded 
that the FBI may have committed 
“tens of thousands” of violations 
of federal law, regulations, or 
Executive Orders between 
2001 and 2008.

At an April 2005 Senate hearing, 
Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) 
asked Mueller: 
“Can the National Security Agency, 
the great electronic snooper, 
spy on the American people?" 

Mueller replied: 
"I would say generally,
they are not allowed to spy
or to gather information 
on American citizens."

Nine months later, the New York Times 
revealed that Bush had unleashed 
NSA to illegally wiretap up to 500 people 
within the U.S. at any given time 
and peruse millions of other Americans’ 
emails. 

Mueller’s biggest attack on privacy
occurred with Section 215 of the 
Patriot Act, which entitles the FBI 
to demand “business records” 
that are “relevant” to a terrorism 
or espionage investigation. 

In 2011 testimony to the Senate Intelligence 
Committee, Mueller “suggested the FBI 
interpreted (Section 215) narrowly 
and used it sparingly,” the ACLU noted. 

But several times a year, 
Mueller signed orders to the 
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance 
Court, swaying it to continually renew 
its order compelling telephone companies 
to deliver all their calling records 
(including time, duration, and location 
of calls) to the National Security Agency.

On June 5, 2013, leaks from former 
NSA contractor Edward Snowden 
revealed this massive NSA surveillance.