Friday, October 5, 2018

Why I believe Christine Ford and Brett Kavanaugh were never in the same room, or same house / building before last week

By popular demand,
Here are 
several reasons
I believed 
Christine Ford
was lying, 
before her
Senate testimony, 
after which,
it more obvious to me
that she was lying.

I took two days off 
from my three blogs
to think about this
circus.

I'm not a Democrat,
or a Republican --
I've been a libertarian
since 1973 -- I appreciate
a party with principles,
(smaller government = more freedom)
even if they never win 
an election.

What annoys me the most
is lying, whether deliberate
or unintentional.

The whole Kavanaugh
confirmation circus,
still in progres,
annoyed me 
-- it was
nothing more
than a fiction-based
political character
assassination, 
which made me 
embarrassed 
to be an American, 
for the first time 
since $#@&% 
George W. Bush 
started a war with Iraq,
( which had nothing to do 
with the 9/11 attack ).

Before that, 
I was embarrassed
to live in a nation
where 58,000+ Americans 
were sacrificed in Vietnam,
along with over 200,000 
South Vietnamese, yet we,
with nuclear weapons,
and the biggest military
in the world, managed 
to lose a war to North Vietnam.

Never mind whether or not 
we should have been there
in the first place!











So here we are with
the reasons I thought 
Christine Ford was lying:

(1) 
Ford was a leftist --
a progressive Bernie
Sanders suporter --
truth is not a leftist value,
power is a leftist value,
so lying to get power
is justified in their
minds, and makes the liar
a hero to other leftists,
whether or not 
she succeeds 
(eg; Anita Hill).


(2)
Dumbocrats (see picture)
said they'd never allow 
Kavanaugh to be confirmed,









... so a last minute surprise,
or two, were practically
promised, if the Dumbs
"needed" a surprise, 
and a surprise was needed.


(3)
Dumbocrats did not 
investigate Ford's claims
to get information to
corroborate her story,
or they did investigate,
and didn't find corroboration,
in the almost two months
they had to investigate.


(4)
Ford's character
and background, 
was deliberately hidden:
  Did anyone realize
she was a multi-millionaire
with  $3.3 million home 
in Palo Alto, another
home in Santa Cruz,
and perhaps even more
real estate assets ?

Ford's social media 
posts "disappeared".

Ford's high school yearbook
"disappeared"

Ford's
therapist notes 
were kept hidden.

Ford's alleged lie detector test,
which I doubt she even took,
was not videotaped, and
the questions asked
were kept secret.


(5)
Most important was 
the original fictional story, 
seemed well planned 
to provide just enough details
to be somewhat believable, 
and nothing extra
-- no additional details 
that were beyond
the minimum required.

The more details, 
the more likely
that one of the details 
could be refuted,
and the more details 
that had to be
remembered, 
to be consistent.

When her hazy memory was
causing too many doubts,
Ford "suddenly remembered"
more details,
such as the names of
two others teens there, 
and each additional detail
made story less believable.

With a true story, 
added details make 
the story more believable!




Folks, I may be 
turning 65 soon.
but I still remember 
"just enough"
to recognize 
that it's not easy
to be a teenage girl,

If you're a good girl,
you get teased about 
being a virgin, or some
guy is likely to brag
he did something with you,
even though he never did.

If you're a bad girl,
I can't imagaine what
is said about you
behind your back.

Even worse, 
through high school
and college years, 
I believe the odds 
of being touched
inappropriately, 
or "manhandled",
or date raped 
while drunk or high, 
etc., is up to 90%.

Not that boys are immune
from assaults by other boys, 
and in the wrong neighborhoods, 
gunfire.

So I would be surprised
if Christine Ford was never
abused in some way by a boy, 
even if just a date touching
her where she didn't want 
to be touched, or just 
a boy grabbing her ass,
although there's 
no evidence
Ford was ever in 
the same room
as Brett Kavanaugh, 
or ever met him.

I don't consider being wrestled
onto a bed, in front of a witness,
and then being allowed to get away,
without a scratch, to be an 
"attempted rape". 

It was an assault, no doubt,
but maybe not a sexual assault,
when all her clothing, 
and the bathing suit
allegedly under her clothing,
remained on the whole time. 

A real rapist would not want
a witness watching him,
and would not let his victim 
get away so easily, 
without a scratch, 
I believe.

The event 
that Christine Ford described
with Brett Kavanaugh and 
Mark Judge, never happened,
and there is no evidence it did.