Sunday, November 22, 2020

Random Thoughts on Computer Election Fraud

WHY  BE  SUSPICIOUS ?

Interesting how ALL of these compiuter 'glitches", "forgotten ballots", counting "mistakes", and the many 2020 election rule changes, favored only ONE candidate.  ALL in favor of Joe Biden ! 


With little campaigning, very small crowds, showing little entusiasm, generally unpopular socialiast policies he rarely talked about, two opposing positions on fracking, low charisma, and a vice president with negative charisma, whose state was going Democrat without her on the ticket, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris seemed like a team picked by Republicans, for the sole purpose of losing to Donald Trump.


Strangely, in 2020, Joe Biden actiually underperformed Hillary Clinton (Democrat 2016) in many metro areas, except for some big metro areas, including Detroit, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Milwaukee and Phoenix. In those metro areas, Biden's votes exceeded the votes received by Hillary Clinton (in 2016) and Obama (in 2008, and 2012).


In 2020, Trump's votes exceeded his own 2016 votes in every metro area, including Democrat LA and NYC. 


It was very unusual for so many Republican candidates to win in 2020 ... except for the Republican president.


Biden had an unusually large increase of votyes, versus Hillary Clinton in 2016, in the swing states ... and only the  swing ... while Trump got more votes everywhere, even in blue strongholds. 



Random thoughts 
on voter computer systems:
A voter system is: 
You mark a box or circle, which triggers an action, that triggers a response, and modifies a counter. Simple stuff. 
 
The election software system in Michigan that allegedly switched 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden is called "Dominion." It is used in 30 states including: Nevada, Arizona, Minnesota. Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia and Pennsylvania.  
 
Software does not just accidentally switch 6,000 votes. I believe this software needs a thorough forensic examination before any of its output is considered to be valid.


Easy to test. Feed the counting software various known quantities of votes and check against the computed counts. The same way the weights and measures departments test gas pumps for tampering. They pull random amounts of fuel from the pumps, weigh them and check against the pump meter.

But ... If I were in the business of creating fraudulent election machines, I’d make the fraud dependent on the date. Only the vote counts on November 3rd would be falsified.  (Note to authorities -- that's just my imagination)


Were there other computer count "mistakes" besides the "6,000" in Michigan?
    Once is likely to be an accident
    Twice may be coincidence
    Three times is a conspiracy !


The solution is that no software should be allowed in voting machines unless it is open-source and can be verified to be the same software running during election day. 


Real software glitches would tend to lose votes, or produce multiples of votes, or produce garbage numbers (like "candidate 44", when there were only 4 candidates). Any errors from "glitches" would tend to be somewhat randomly distributed.

There are plenty of reverse engineers in the cyber security industry that could audit the Dominion software, and other brands. There is no other way a system "glitch" woiuld 'change the votes' unless it was coded to do so. People do not understand what 'glitches' really are. Software doesn't do anything that you don't tell it to do.