Monday, November 23, 2020

Detroit poll watcher Articia Bomer tells her story of apparent fraud and corruption of the Detroit vote 

The video at the link above is very long and tedious, but this summary from the same link is enough:

Michigan Witness and Former US Congressional Candidate Speaks Out — Saw the Biden Ballot Dump at 4 AM and Witnessed Officials Tampering with Tabulators! (VIDEO)

Yet another witness has come forward to say that she witnessed VOTER FRAUD in Detroit on election day.

Bomer describes:

  • Hearing an announcement of 50 boxes at 4am: the Biden Ballot Dump!
  • Hearing that the Biden Ballot Dump was counted and processed in an impossibly short amount of time
  • Witnessing officials TAMPERING with tabulators at the TCF Center!
  • Ballot harvesting operations being done by a local Church
  • Poll workers overriding the actual votes, and changing Trump votes to BIDEN!
  • Poll workers REFUSING TO COUNT Trump votes!
  • Poll workers bringing in luggage and boxes that could have contained illegal ballots
  • Poll Workers using deceitful tactics and colluding with Democrats to try and EXPEL GOP Poll Challengers
  • GOP Poll Challengers being EJECTED from observing the vote count
  • GOP Poll Challengers were observing ILLEGAL BALLOTS and their objections were IGNORED
  • Poll workers being obvious Democrat PARTISANS
  • Suspicious meetings of the poll workers

Bomer describes a Detroit poll worker who used correction tape to rig the machines to generate errors that could be overridden by staff.

“Our goal was to secure the vote.” Bomer raised her concerns at the time with the GOP Attorneys on-site but nothing appears to have been done in response to her statements.

“Now? I don’t have faith in any election system after having witnessed this fraud happen right before my eyes,” Bomer said.

Patrrick Byrne, who founded, explains the "Drop and Roll" method of voting machine fraud -- the video is interesting

Sunday, November 22, 2020

Random Thoughts on Computer Election Fraud


Interesting how ALL of these compiuter 'glitches", "forgotten ballots", counting "mistakes", and the many 2020 election rule changes, favored only ONE candidate.  ALL in favor of Joe Biden ! 

With little campaigning, very small crowds, showing little entusiasm, generally unpopular socialiast policies he rarely talked about, two opposing positions on fracking, low charisma, and a vice president with negative charisma, whose state was going Democrat without her on the ticket, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris seemed like a team picked by Republicans, for the sole purpose of losing to Donald Trump.

Strangely, in 2020, Joe Biden actiually underperformed Hillary Clinton (Democrat 2016) in many metro areas, except for some big metro areas, including Detroit, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Milwaukee and Phoenix. In those metro areas, Biden's votes exceeded the votes received by Hillary Clinton (in 2016) and Obama (in 2008, and 2012).

In 2020, Trump's votes exceeded his own 2016 votes in every metro area, including Democrat LA and NYC. 

It was very unusual for so many Republican candidates to win in 2020 ... except for the Republican president.

Biden had an unusually large increase of votyes, versus Hillary Clinton in 2016, in the swing states ... and only the  swing ... while Trump got more votes everywhere, even in blue strongholds. 

Random thoughts 
on voter computer systems:
A voter system is: 
You mark a box or circle, which triggers an action, that triggers a response, and modifies a counter. Simple stuff. 
The election software system in Michigan that allegedly switched 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden is called "Dominion." It is used in 30 states including: Nevada, Arizona, Minnesota. Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia and Pennsylvania.  
Software does not just accidentally switch 6,000 votes. I believe this software needs a thorough forensic examination before any of its output is considered to be valid.

Easy to test. Feed the counting software various known quantities of votes and check against the computed counts. The same way the weights and measures departments test gas pumps for tampering. They pull random amounts of fuel from the pumps, weigh them and check against the pump meter.

But ... If I were in the business of creating fraudulent election machines, I’d make the fraud dependent on the date. Only the vote counts on November 3rd would be falsified.  (Note to authorities -- that's just my imagination)

Were there other computer count "mistakes" besides the "6,000" in Michigan?
    Once is likely to be an accident
    Twice may be coincidence
    Three times is a conspiracy !

The solution is that no software should be allowed in voting machines unless it is open-source and can be verified to be the same software running during election day. 

Real software glitches would tend to lose votes, or produce multiples of votes, or produce garbage numbers (like "candidate 44", when there were only 4 candidates). Any errors from "glitches" would tend to be somewhat randomly distributed.

There are plenty of reverse engineers in the cyber security industry that could audit the Dominion software, and other brands. There is no other way a system "glitch" woiuld 'change the votes' unless it was coded to do so. People do not understand what 'glitches' really are. Software doesn't do anything that you don't tell it to do. 

Venezuila Election fraud article from three years ago sounds like the U.S. in 2020 (from the Wall Street Journal)

Excerpts from a good article in the Wall Street Journal three years ago, on voting machine-based fraud in Venezuela:

(the article was not free and this is all I could manage to get for free)

EL CASABE, Venezuela—Aires Pérez Rodríguez traveled by canoe for three hours to deliver the paper receipts showing a total of 225 votes cast for state governor in this hamlet. Then he passed them to his aunt, who drove them a further 150 miles to the Bolívar state capital.

When the official count was released days after the Oct. 15 election, however, there were an extra 471 votes for the government’s candidate. It wasn’t just Mr. Pérez, the opposition party’s election monitor, who noticed. The ruling Socialist Party’s own election supervisor in El Casabe realized it, too.

“This is illegal,” said Luciano Mendoza, the election supervisor, who showed The Wall Street Journal the voting-machine receipts that counted just a third as many votes from the hamlet as reported by electoral authorities later. “They say they bring justice, but instead they commit fraud."

Mr. Pérez’s evidence prompted opposition officials in Ciudad Bolívar to make more comparisons of voting receipts to an official tally on the National Electoral Council’s website. All told, in records reviewed by the Journal, they discovered that more than 2,500 votes were added statewide, flipping the winner of the Bolívar state election from the opposition candidate—briefly listed as the winner on the Electoral Council’s website—to the government choice.

The declared winner, Justo Noguera, a National Guard general from outside the state who never held political office, took office two days later in a surprise midnight ceremony.

“There’s clear manipulation here,” said Luis Lander, director of the Venezuelan Electoral Observatory, a nonpartisan group in Caracas that tracks elections after he examined voting-machine receipts that the opposition alliance posted online. “The results were altered to allow the losing candidate to be declared the winner.”

Saturday, November 21, 2020

Effective November 20 -- new Supreme Court assignments

 When fast action is required:

Effective November 20, 2020, 
ordered pursuant to Title 28, 
United States Code, Section 42

MI – Brett M. Kavanaugh
WI – Amy Coney Barrett
PA – Samuel A. Alito
GA – Clarence Thomas

Prior assignments ending November 19 
Justice Alito (3rd Circuit) for Pennsylvania (same)
Justice Thomas (11th Circuit) for Georgia (same)
Justice Kavanaugh (7th Circuit) for Wisconsin (changed)
Justice Sotomayor (6th Circuit) for Michigan (changed)

A little less than a month after the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Supreme Court on Friday issued a new set of circuit justice assignments, which take effect immediately. Barrett was assigned to the 7th Circuit, which includes Wisconsin, where she served as a judge for three years before becoming a justice. 

A circuit justice is primarily responsible for emergency requests from the geographic area covered by his or her circuit. Justices can and often do refer significant emergency requests to the full court.

For "bellwether" counties that consistently voted for the winner the past 40 years -- 18 of 19 picked Trump in 2020

 Of the 19 "bellwether" counties that have consistently voted for the presidential winner since 1980, all but one chose Trump. ( source: Wall Street Journal )

Washington state's Clallam County was the only one of the 19 that favored Joe Biden. Biden won Washington state by over 19 percentage points, but carried the far northwest, rural county by only about 3 percentage points.

Vigo County in Indiana has chosen the winner correctly since 1956 -- they chose Trump in 2020 (wrong only in 1888, 1908 and 1952).

Just 2.5% of the nation's counties flipped from one party in 2016, to the other in 2020. Mostly by narrow margins.

State "bellwethers" Ohio and Florida both favored Trump. Ohio favored the losing candidate only twice since 1896 (Richard Nixon in his close loss to Kennedy in 1960 and Thomas Dewey in his famous 1944 upset loss to Harry Truman)

The mysterious Dominion vote counting software and America's broken election system

The election was going Trump’s way until vote counts suddenly "stopped" in the middle of the night after the November 3, 2020 Election Day. Trump was ahead then. 

On Thursday:
The main Dominion office in Toronto closed along with the Dominion office in Denver. Hundreds of Dominion employees have deleted their LinkedIn accounts and other social media profiles. Dominion representatives didn’t show up for an oversight hearing of the Pennsylvania Assembly at which they were scheduled to appear. The actions of a company that has nothing to hide?

America's Election System is broken.
Four solutions:

Since 1992. Gives people months to vote while ballots sit around waiting to be counted. Who is watching them?  If you aren’t going to be in town, or have a physical disability, you specifically request an absentee ballot sent to your home or apartment.


People reported being given one ballot in their married name and one ballot in their maiden name. Some people reported getting ballots for other people who used to live at their address. They could sign them and send them in and they would be counted. No one is verifying who received all these ballots.

Democrat falsely claim making people show an ID to vote is somehow “disenfranchisement.”  So, Is making a person show an ID to buy beer “beer disenfranchisement?

A presidential election only happens once every four years and we have managed to count votes in one night (except once before, for Bush v. Gore, only in Florida in 2000). Use two shifts or counters if necessary. And the count should never start  without representatives from both parties observing CLOSELY the whole time.

In January 2020, the CEOs of the three companies that produce over 80 percent of voting machines in the U.S. – Election Systems & Software (ES&S), Dominion Voting Systems and Hart InterCivic – were grilled by members of Congress over the question of security at the ballot box.

The little known President Trump
September 12, 2018 State of Emergency

An executive order on September 12, 2018 is titled “Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election.”

The 2020 election was conducted under this state of emergency: In the EO, the President states that people and organizations located, in part, outside the United States are known to be able to, “interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation.”

This foreign interference in U.S. elections, “constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”

Dominion Voting Systems is a Canadian company.  And Scytl voting systems is run out of Spain.  Which makes both Dominion and Scytl a “foreign interference issue.” Both represent “foreign interference” in US elections… with Dominion data routed through servers in Germany.

Votes cast by Americans were counted by a bankrupt Spanish company Scytl in Spain. Like Dominion, Scytl has a long history of election fraud in various nations, including injecting backdoors in its election software.

Trump’s 2018 executive order gives the Department of Justice the power to seize all assets of individuals and companies that have, “directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election.”    In Section 8, the order explains “person” also means, “a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization.”

…the term “election infrastructure” means information and communications technology and systems used by or on behalf of the Federal Government or a State or local government in managing the election process, including voter registration databases, voting machines, voting tabulation equipment, and equipment for the secure transmission of election results.

 “foreign interference" means:  " …any covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions."

Trump attorney Sidney Powell describes “staggering statistical evidence” and “staggering witness testimony” about the criminal election fraud that was carried out across America.

Representative Louis Gohmert (R-TX) claims the US military has just conducted a raid on the server farm of the now-bankrupt Scytl company in Barcelona, Spain.  The server may provide direct evidence of who gave the direction to stop counting, in some cities, and who initiated any algorithm that started switching votes. 

Even if this charge is true, nothing will happen without convincing evidence presented within four to five weeks after the election. That's very little time for investigation. And U.S. state “certification” of the fraudulent votes is just theater.

Ms. Mellissa Carone was a contracted worker for Dominion, a company providing software services for ballot counting machines in Detroit. She was sent to Detroit, Michigan, to provide technical support for the ballot counting process.  While she was there she noted poll workers repeatedly double scanning ballots to generate multiple votes from the same batch of ballot sheets.  When she reported this to her employer, Mr. Nick Ikonomakis of Dominion, Carone was told it was not her role to  review what the poll workers are doing; essentially to ignore it.  Ms. Carone also witnessed election workers filling out ballots, fraudulently signing ballots, as well as the unloading of vans in an area of the Detroit election tabulation facility she was not permitted to inspect. Ms Carone was on Fox Business with Lou Dobbs to explain part of what she witnessed.

Rudy Giuliani claims100,000 ballots were brought into a ballot center in Michigan to “catch up with Trump.” This is coming from a sworn affidavit from an eyewitness, one of hundreds who will soon be presented to the courts. Giuliani has built a good reputation over his lifetime and I strongly doubt he would ruin in by making this up.

Dominion software deleted over 2.8 million Trump votes nationwide, switched over 512,000 from Trump to Biden. The claim is detailed in the chart below:


The claim is that Dominion Voting Systems voting machine software machines is riddled with backdoor methods for remote access users who can alter votes and change the outcome of entire elections.

“In Antrim County ( Michigan ) ballots were counted for Democrats that were meant for Republicans, causing a 6,000 vote swing against our candidates,” Michigan Republican Party Chairwoman Laura Cox said at a press conference Nov. 6. “The county clerk came forward and said, ‘tabulating software "glitched" and caused a miscalculation of the votes.’”

It was reported that thousands of votes in one Michigan country intended for Donald Trump went to his challenger, Joe Biden. According to Michigan state government website, “ ... erroneous reporting of unofficial results … was a result of accidental error on the part of the Antrim County Clerk (who) accidentally did not update the software used to collect voting machine data and report unofficial results.”

A Denver-based Canadian Crown Agent company Dominion Voting Systems has a long history of allegation of election rigging and interference in elections of various nations, including census data theft in India and claimed interference in U.S. Elections of 2020.

Dominion systems were also used in other battleground states: Nevada, Arizona, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — all of which went for or are leaning towards Biden.  Dominion systems have been rejected three times by Texas election officials because they could not meet basic cyber security requirements (their report at the end of this article)..

Presidential lawyer Rudy Giuliani announced Wednesday that whistleblowers from Dominion are coming forward to give sworn statements on how the systems were compromised.

Another state that relies heavily on Dominion Voting Systems is Georgia, which received 30,000 ($107 million) new voting machines last year – "the largest rollout of elections equipment in U.S. history,” according to the Government Technology newsletter.

Thursday night Dominion Voting Systems abruptly backed out of attending a fact-finding hearing that was set for Friday morning with the Pennsylvania House State Government Committee. At a press conference Friday morning, State Government Committee Chair Seth Grove said the 1.3. million Pennsylvanians who used Dominion’s voting machines have been “hung out to dry and slapped in their faces.”  

Grove blasted the company for “retreating into the darkness,” rather than appearing at the hearing with “honesty and integrity.” ... “After weeks of accusations, why has Dominion Voting Systems not released any analysis of the success of its voting machines to the public in order to stop their accusers in their tracks? If they have nothing to hide, why are they hiding from us?” he asked.

That non-event on Thursday
 inspired this article.

Article on Smartmatic software:

"Texas analysis of Dominion
Democracy Suite 5.5-A
(voting machine) software:

Note:  The Conclusion is at the end of this letter

The State of Texas
Ruth R. Hughs Secretary of State

On October 2-3, 2019, Dominion Voting Systems ("Dominion" or the "Vendor") presented the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system for examination and certification. The examination was conducted in Austin, Texas. Pursuant to Sections 122.035(a) and (b) of the Texas Election Code, the Secretary of State appointed the following examiners:

Mr. Tom Watson, an expert in electronic data communication systems;
 Mr. Brian Mechler, an expert in electronic data communication systems; Mr. Brandon Hurley, an expert in election law and procedure; and
Mr. Charles Pinney, an expert in election law and procedure.

Pursuant to Section 122.035(a), the Texas Attorney General appointed the following examiners:

1.    Dr. Jim Sneeringer, an expert in electronic data communication systems; and

2.    Mr. Ryan Vassar, an employee of the Texas Attorney General.

On October 2, 2019, Mr. Pinney, Mr. Mechler, and Dr. Sneeringer witnessed the installation of the Democracy Suite 5.5-A software and firmware that the Office of the Texas Secretary of State (the "Office") received directly from the Independent Testing Authority. The next day, Mr. Pinney examined the accessibility components ofthe ImageCast X Ballot Marking Device.

On October 3, 2019, the Vendor demonstrated the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system and answered questions presented by the examiners. Test ballots were then processed on each voting device. The results were accumulated and later verified for accuracy by staff of the Secretary of State.

Examiner reports regarding the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
On December 27, 2019, pursuant to Section 122.0371 of the Texas Election Code, the Office held a public hearing for interested persons to express views for or against the certification ofthe Democracy Suite 5.5-A system.

The Democracy Suite 5.5-A system is an updated version of the Democracy Suite 5.5 system, which was denied certification by the Office on June 20, 2019. The Democracy Suite 5.5-A system includes certain software and hardware updates to the Suite 5.5 version.  Democracy Suite 5.5-A has been evaluated at an accredited independent voting system laboratory for conformance to the 2005 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG). Democracy Suite 5.5-A was certified by the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) on January 30, 2019.

The components of Democracy Suite 5.5-A are as follows:
EMS - Election Management System
ADJ - Adjudication
ICC - ImageCast Central
ICX - ImageCast X BMD
ICP - ImageCast Precinct

Election Management System
Central scanner
Ballot marking device
Precinct scanner

The following are the findings, based on written evidence submitted by the Vendor in support of its application for certification, oral evidence presented at the examination, and the findings of the voting system examiners as set out in their written reports.  The examiner reports identified multiple hardware and software issues that preclude the Office of the Texas Secretary of State from determining that the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system satisfies each of the voting-system requirements set forth in the Texas Election Code.

Specifically, the examiner reports raise concerns about whether the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system is suitable for its intended purpose; operates efficiently and accurately; and is safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation. Therefore, the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system and corresponding hardware devices do not meet the standards for certification prescribed by Section 122.001 ofthe Texas Election Code.

Accordingly, based upon the foregoing, I hereby deny certification of Dominion Voting Systems' Democracy Suite 5.5-A system for use in Texas elections.

Signed under my hand and seal of office, this day of 2020.