NOTE:
Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee collects a lot of interesting facts and coincidences. They don't lead to a conclusion yet, but they are well worth reading. There are several links included -- i read all of them and recommend them. I had many Hunter Biden articles here beginning in mid-2019. The laptop confirmed what was already known, and previously reported by investigative reporter Peter Schweitzer. The mass media and social media censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop told you why I provide three blogs with uncensored information, as an antidote. Hunter Biden is a grifter and his father Joe Biden ("The Big Guy") got a piece of the action.
Ye Editor
"With all that’s been discussed about Hunter Biden’s laptop --- what it reveals about the Biden family
and the shocking lengths to which government agencies, politicians and the media LIED, at least until Biden was safely in office
--- there’s yet another aspect to the story, one we touched on last week but would like to examine more deeply now.
Doesn’t it seem like an odd coincidence that the very parts of the world that are exploding now are the ones the Biden family was greatly profiting from; namely, Ukraine, Russia and China?
(For this discussion, we’re focusing on Ukraine.)
This is why voters deserve to know all about a candidate’s potential conflicts of interest before putting him in office.
And doesn’t it also seem weird that the same people whose names we first heard during Trump's first impeachment, some of them officials at the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine,
are now popping up in revelations about the Trump/Russia Hoax?
The two casts of characters overlap --- why is that?
It’s long been known by people in government that the corruption in Ukraine made it possible for some Americans to profit hugely.
Hunter Biden is an easy example, but numerous people with marketable influence in both parties have apparently used corrupt institutions in Ukraine as their own personal ATM,
laundering huge piles of cash as they changed hands for various reasons.
Nobody asked questions.
The elite members of this club brought in their families, friends and colleagues.
It’s been going on for decades.
NOTE: As we’ve said before, the corruption in Ukraine in no way excuses the cold disregard and unforgivable violence Putin has shown to its people, most of whom were just trying to make a living and support their families and communities. Russia is chock-full of corruption as well. So is America, for that matter, as we’re learning more each day. Those who use Ukrainian corruption to rationalize what Putin is doing are trying to defend the indefensible.
That said, it’s also important to recognize that what we’re seeing of the corruption is just the tip of the iceberg.
Imagine if Hunter had somehow dimly remembered his laptop was at the repair shop and had managed, in his drug-addled state, to crawl his way back there and pick it up.
Life would have gone on, with most of us likely never knowing the extent of Biden family graft.
Maybe a few dedicated reporters like Miranda Devine and Peter Schweizer would have succeeded in nibbling around the edges, perhaps written books that conservatives would read, but that would’ve been it.
Likewise, what if Hillary’s use of a private server as Secretary of State had never been exposed?
What if Guccifer had never hacked into Sidney Blumenthal’s account and ended up with her private address on classified emails about Benghazi,
and if State Department lawyers hadn’t noticed that address themselves and looked into it?
Hillary’s criminal (yes) use of a private server for classified official business would have remained a secret.
With her load of baggage lightened, she might’ve been elected President after all.
At any rate, she would’ve gotten away clean.
Some of my readers –- I know, because they write to me –- are thinking, “Well, she DID get away clean.
Why do we even bother talking about these scandals?
Nothing ever happens.”
At the risk of sounding like Hillary herself, they carp, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”
I would argue that it makes a tremendous difference that we don’t just live with the lies.
Those of us who’ve been investigating this for years are at last breaking through to the public at large, who only now are learning what we’ve known for some time:
that a reasonable prosecutor WOULD have taken Hillary’s case,
that there really ARE deep-state actors in our bureaucracy,
that the Bidens --- including “the big guy” --- ARE corrupt,
that “trump Russia collusion” WAS a hoax all along,
that the laptop IS real and the FBI withheld it during Trump’s impeachment,
that social media is a leftist propaganda arm,
and that some people who say they care about “our democracy” really just want to keep their personal gravy train rolling.
Americans are wising up.
The next step (and it’s a loo-loo) is to acknowledge that suppressing the laptop WAS election interference, likely changing the outcome of the Biden-Trump race.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/suppression-of-hunter-biden-laptop-stories-defeinitely-impacted-2020-election-barr_
Incidentally, Barr also says that Biden knowingly lied about the laptop being Russian disinformation.
He was “shocked,” he says. Barr tells us this...NOW??
https://slaynews.com/news/bill-barr-comes-clean-says-joe-biden-lied-to-american-people-he-knew-it-was-a-lie-and-i-was-shocked-by-that/
According to investigative reporter Peter Schweizer, the timing of the admission in The New York Times that the laptop is real, with the coordination we might assume they had with Hunter’s legal team and the White House, indicates to him that Hunter is likely to be indicted.
(So, does he then get pardoned by his father?)
Jonathan Turley, in an interview with Brian Kilmeade Monday night, agreed.
“There’s only so long you can deny something that’s staring you in the face,” he said.
He noted that since they’ve finally acknowledged it’s real, we can move forward to talk about what it means.
Which brings us back to Ukraine. Mollie Hemingway’s book RIGGED, the chapter “Burying Biden Corruption,” details not only Hunter’s profits in Ukraine ‘serving’ on the Burisma board
but also how committee chairman Adam Schiff made sure this were never brought up in the hearings, as it would’ve justified Trump’s “impeachable” phone call to President Zelenskyy.
The word “rigged” applies just as well to that sham impeachment as it does to the election.
Dan Bongino has been talking about the curious re-emergence of the same Ukrainian names we heard during the impeachment.
He dug up an article in Politico from November 2019, about Ukrainian-American DNC political consultant Alexandra Chalupa wanting to “raise the alarm” about Trump campaign director Paul Manafort’s alleged Russian ties.
Recall that Manafort was forced to resign, and later hounded by Robert Mueller’s special counsel, over the so-called “black ledger” of payments supposedly made to him by a pro-Russia political party in Ukraine –- a ledger that has been determined to be fake.
What Politico said at the time about Republicans trying to hold back “a mountain of emerging evidence” that showed Trump “used his leverage over Ukraine to pressure the country’s leaders to investigate his political rivals” seems laughable now.
What a waste of our nation’s time and taxpayers’ money.
Let’s see...I can think of an American VICE-President who used his leverage to pressure Ukraine’s leaders NOT to investigate someone.
That was joe Biden.
A photo turned up of Chalupa in the White House, standing next to the man identified as the impeachment “whistle blower” over Trump’s phone call.
Recall that we were never supposed to say his name, but we did: Eric Ciaramella.
The big take-away: These people were all working together, folks, and that’s the real “collusion.”
Remember this about Ciaramella, from Paul Sperry?
The deeper significance of Hunter laptop story, Part 2, by Mike Huckabee
"Part 1 observed that some of the names from Trump’s first impeachment, mostly from our own embassy in Ukraine,
were the same as those involved in the Trump/Russia Hoax as revealed in special counsel John Durham’s indictment of Clinton/DNC attorney Michael Sussmann.
We wondered why that might be.
Before we continue with that, here are a few updates on the Hunter laptop story:
Monday on Jesse Watters Primetime, investigative reporter Peter Schweizer reiterated what he’s said about Hunter being close to criminal indictment.
He said The New York Times “got a lot of cooperation from Team Biden” before they ran the story on Hunter that included their admission that the laptop was, indeed, real.
He says Biden’s team were “trying to position themselves.”
Of course, this case isn’t really about Hunter but the President of the United States,
and a criminal indictment (of Hunter) would open up “that whole can of worms” concerning dad’s connections to dirty money and the associated tax issues and huge national security concerns.
https://noqreport.com/2022/03/22/the-ny-times-admitted-the-truth-about-hunter-biden-because-they-know-something-is-about-to-happen/
So, “does Hunter Biden become the sacrificial lamb?” Schweizer asked.
“Does he end up taking a plea deal that might even mean jail time in order to protect his father?”
Also, Margot Cleveland has a new piece detailing eight Joe Biden scandals revealed in Hunter’s laptop that have been finally been confirmed in mainstream media as real.
She echoes Schweizer, saying, “These scandals are not about Hunter Biden. They are about now-President Biden.”
These are areas that an honest media would ask about, she says –- the implication being that they won’t.
Her piece a must-read.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/03/22/8-joe-biden-scandals-inside-hunter-bidens-macbook-that-corporate-media-just-admitted-is-legit/
Now, to Part 2.
Yesterday, as a way to help understand Ukraine and the Bidens’ activities there, we recommended Chapters 2 and 8 in Dan Bongino’s book “FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Cabal. Let’s pick up there…
According to Bongino, the hard-working Ukrainian people are “desperate for honest leadership” but “have been consistently let down by a broken political class eager for power and riches.”
Ukraine and Washington DC are the two centers of a group he calls Scandal Manufacturers of America (SMA), which dedicated itself to a takedown of Donald Trump.
These people helped come up with the Russia Hoax, and later, when that failed to take him down, they assisted with his first impeachment.
That’s why we see some of the same names in both.
(Side note: The New York Times caught some richly-deserved grief from Candace Owens when they accused her of copying “Russian state media” when she “advanced the idea that Ukraine is a corrupt country.” She informed them she’d learned of Ukraine’s corruption from The New York Times, offering as one example an NYT editorial called “Ukraine’s Unyielding Corruption.” We bring this up so as not to also be falsely accused of working on behalf of Putin when we point out the deep well of Ukrainian corruption.)
Bongino calls Paul Manafort “ground zero for all the manufactured Trump scandals.”
Manafort was a consultant for Trump’s campaign and then the chairman, bringing with him tons of baggage from alleged dark dealings in Ukraine. What we have always wondered
--- perhaps Bongino has the answer
--- is this: exactly how did someone who was so notorious as a shady lobbyist get to BE chairman of Trump’s campaign?
It was just soooooo convenient for Trump’s enemies to have Manafort, of all people, in that spot.
So we suspect there’s more to this story.
His baggage was made to order for anyone looking to derail Trump’s campaign.
Rick Gates, Manafort’s business partner, was with the campaign as well, as deputy, and later became a cooperating witness for the special counsel in Manafort's trial.
Manafort lasted with Trump for about six months.
Ironically, what brought him down –- in five days –- was FAKED evidence in the form of a “black ledger” of supposed payments from a pro-Russia political party.
By continuing to hound him after he left, Trump’s enemies thought they might bring Trump down, too.
The ledger had nothing to do with the Russia hoax; it was a red herring, to cast a cloud over the campaign and provide a pretext for ongoing investigation.
George Soros, probably the most influential man in Ukraine, is a big part part of this story, too.
He gave $1 million to the humorously-named Democratic Integrity Project, headed by Daniel J. Jones, a former FBI analyst and staffer for California Sen. Dianne Feinstein.
Jones had started the nonprofit (seems pretty profitable to me) after Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS approached him with the idea of forming the organization.
Then, after filling its coffers to the tune of $7 million, Jones turned around and wrote a check to Fusion GPS for $3.3 million! I am not making this up.
The same players keep turning up again and again.
Fusion GPS’s task: to research how Russia intelligence operations were affecting elections around the world.
And they brought in Hillary’s campaign chairman John Podesta to help.
Still not making it up, my friends.
This was after Podesta’s and the DNC’s emails had been purloined (the narrative became that they were hacked by Russia) and published by Wikileaks, to the DNC’s embarrassment.
(Incidentally, John's lobbyist brother Tony was under investigation at that time for “cashing in” in Ukraine.
He was paid $1.2 million to promote a plan conceived, ironically, by Manfort and Gates.)
Then there’s the story you know, the investigation of Burisma by prosecutor Victor Shokin until then-Vice President Biden got him fired by threatening to withhold a $1 billion loan guarantee.
By now everyone has seen the video of Biden bragging about it before a live audience --- without mentioning Hunter was on the Burisma board.
There’s much more, involving Soros and an investigation by Shokin’s replacement into a Soros-funded organization, the ironically-named Anti-Corruption Action Center (AntAC).
This was when the new U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch (remember her from Trump’s impeachment?) gave the prosecutor a list of people not to prosecute, including a founder of AntAC.
Second-in-command George Kent had already tried to discourage the prosecutor from investigating.
According to reporter John Solomon, their message to Ukraine officials was this:
“Don’t target AntAC in the middle of an American presidential election in which Soros was backing Hillary Clinton to succeed another Soros favorite, Barack Obama.”
There are others in Ukraine tied to both the Russia hoax and Trump's impeachment.
California Rep. Adam Schiff, running the impeachment, trotted out our diplomatic “experts” from Ukraine to talk about Trump and his “impeachable” phone call to President Zelenskyy.
Those were Americans, our diplomatic corps, who'd been telling Ukrainian prosecutors who they could and could not prosecute and treating a Soros-funded organization like some sort of sacred cow.
Soros supported Hillary and was Trump’s political enemy.
He funded an organization conceived by Glenn Simpson. Something smells like bad borscht.
Of course, if our own FBI hadn’t withheld Hunter’s laptop, the justification for Trump’s phone call would have been clear.
Oh, the muck in the swamp gets deeper.
Looks as though there will have to be a Part 3."
