Friday, March 11, 2022

The Real Reason Health Officials Stopped Reporting Covid-19 Deaths This Year, by Dr. Joseph Mercola

FULL  ARTICLE  HERE:

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

    The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has stopped mandatory hospital reporting of COVID-19 deaths

and the CDC is hiding data about the effectiveness of the booster shots in people aged 18 to 64, or those least likely to benefit from the shot

    The New York Post notes the FDA overruled an expert advisory committee and the CDC overruled their own experts to promote the booster to all age groups.

Scientists must use Israeli data, which show little to no difference in those boosted or not boosted until people are over age 65

    The CDC justifies not releasing the data saying it was “not ready for prime time,” as it would be misinterpreted and is based on 10% of the population, or the same sample size that has been used for influenza statistics for years

    Data from independent researchers and insurance companies recording all-cause death rates show the number who have died in 2021 after the release of the vaccine exceeds the all-cause death rate in 2020 during the height of the infection

    It is easy to understand why the HHS and CDC want to hide this data from scrutiny as it’s more difficult to ignore with each passing day that the infection didn’t kill the number of people health experts claimed and that the vaccine is killing more than the virus is

Data is the foundation of scientific analysis. Without data, researchers are left unable to draw conclusions, which leaves public health experts unable to accurately make recommendations.

But that appears to be exactly what the CDC1 and Health and Human Services (HHS)2 are doing.

The CDC is hiding data and the HHS is no longer collecting data, which one U.S. official has called “incomprehensible.”

Since the World Health Organization announced a pandemic, multiple organizations began tracking data, including the number of people who were sick with COVID-19, in the hospital with or had died from it.

As I have written, later the number of “cases” was reported.

These were people who had a positive PCR test and did not necessarily have symptoms.

Whistleblowers working with attorney Thomas Renz, who is investigating hospital abuses, have reported that hospitals are

incentivized to admit PCR positive patients,

prescribe remdesivir,

place patients on ventilators and

include COVID on death certificates.

All told, some believe hospitals could receive up to $100,000 for each patient who meets all the incentivized criteria.

Of course, “fact” checkers immediately jumped on that claim in an effort to “debunk” what they call “false” information.

But they simply contradicted themselves in the “fact” checking by changing the semantics of how COVID deaths are counted

and rewording of how hospitals are compensated for COVID patients from “paid more” to receiving a “bump” in payment.

So what’s the difference?

They’re still getting paid more for COVID patients.

In analyzing this, it’s important to look at how data of all sorts are collected on you and everyone else in the world.

For example:

Nearly everything people do is digitally recorded, analyzed and extrapolated for decision making.

You leave a digital footprint each time you use your smartphone or computer.

One study showed digital cookies may have lifetimes up to 8,000 years. In 2010, it was estimated there were 2 zettabytes (ZB) of data created." ...

Posted by at