"On Thursday The Gateway Pundit revealed Democrats and leftists have fought ferociously to prevent the cleanup of State voter registration rolls. (that article follows this one)
Recognizing a potential niche, left-wing activists created ERIC to clean voter rolls their way, using their rules.
So in 2012 the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) was formed as a membership organization primarily for blue States.
ERIC is essentially a left wing voter registration drive disguised as voter roll clean up.
But it’s been gaining traction in Red States too.
Originally funded by the Soros Open Society, it is now responsible for cleaning the voter rolls in 31 States, plus D.C.
A top election official from each member State is appointed a seat on the ERIC Board or as an Officer, all unpaid positions.
As we reported — The ERIC database is comprehensive and would be one of the most coveted by bad actors looking to influence an election.
And the ERIC database looks to be as corrupt as we feared.
Over the past four years, the largest US Counties have removed ZERO ineligible voters from their voter rolls.
States are required by federal law (1993 NVRA) to report to Congress how many ineligible voters they removed from their voter rolls.
These are the registrations of voters who fail to respond to an address confirmation request, and fail to vote in two consecutive elections.
The outstanding team at Judicial Watch recently investigated this data and found some astonishing revelations.
Over the recent 4 year reporting period, large counties in powerful states like NY and CA reported they removed ZERO, ONE, or only TWO ineligible voters from their voter rolls over those 4 years.
Robert Popper, Judicial Watch’s Director of Voting Integrity efforts said:
“About 10% of Americans move every year.
Those counties should generate hundreds of thousands of canceled registrations.
There is simply no way to comply with federal law while removing so few outdated registrations”.
The Gateway Pundit recently published an article about ERIC, a Soros founded non-profit now used by 31 States to clean their voters rolls.
Manhattan, NYC:
with 1.2 million registered voters, removed only TWO (2) ineligible voters.
Sacramento County, CA:
with over 1,000,000 registered voters, removed ZERO (0).
Brooklyn, NYC:
with 1.7 million registered voters, removed ZERO (0).
San Bernardino County, CA:
1.2 million registered voters, removed FOURTEEN (14).
Queens, NYC:
with 1.3 million registered voters, removed ZERO (0).
Fresno County, CA:
over 500,000 registered voters, removed TWO (2).
Bronx, NYC:
with 867,000 registered voters, removed ONE (1) ineligible voters.
Staten Island, NYC:
with 344,000 voters, removed ZERO (0) ineligible voters.
Contra Costa County, CA:
with 704,000 registered voters, removed ONE (1).
Stanislaus County, CA:
with 282,000, removed TWO (2) ineligible voters.
Solano County, CA:
with 262,000, removed FOUR (4) ineligible voters.
Richmond County, NY:
with 347,000 voters, removed ZERO (0) ineligible voters.
Nassau County, NY:
with 1.1 million, removed ZERO (0) ineligible voters.
Judicial Watch sent warning letters to election officials in several states pointing out these impossibly low numbers.
They gave each state 90 days to correct these records or JW “will commence a federal lawsuit.”
A while back they uncovered 1.6 million inactive voters in Los Angeles County and through a 2019 settlement agreement, forced LA to clean up its act.
After Judicial Watch sued Pennsylvania, the state admitted to reporting incorrect information to a federal agency.
But the new PA figures are also too low. PA now admits eighteen (18) counties removed a combined total of only 15 ineligible voters over 2 years.
The States listed below are totals for the recent 4 year period.
New York has sixteen (16) counties that reported removing ZERO (0) voter registrations.
Oregon has fourteen (14) counties that removed FIVE (5) or fewer voter registrations.
Arkansas has eleven (11) counties that removed FIVE (5) or fewer voter registrations.
Illinois has sixteen (16) counties that reported removing ZERO (0) voter registrations.
The NVRA requires states to “conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters” by reason of death or change of address.
Dirty voter rolls matter, and Judicial Watch continues to do astonishing work.
The 2018 Supreme Court decision reaffirmed the 2014 Judicial Watch settlement agreement with Ohio forcing the state to clean up their voter rolls.
Ohio had to follow the law and send address confirmation notices to registered voters.
The JW lawsuit with Colorado charges “an ongoing, systemic problem with Colorado’s voter list maintenance obligations”.
Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in North Carolina for the same reason, and have successfully taken on Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana as well.
Sincere gratitude goes to Tom Fitton, Robert Popper, and the rest of the team and Judicial Watch.."
George Soros Founded and Funded
"For decades the Democrats and leftists have fought ferociously to prevent the cleanup of State voter registration rolls.
Recognizing a potential niche, left wing activists created ERIC to clean voter rolls their way, using their rules.
... ERIC located 17 million new voters for the 2020 election, the most in the history of their organization.
For comparison, they only found 5.7 million in 2012, Obama’s reelection.
The ERIC database is comprehensive and would be one of the most coveted by bad actors looking to influence an election.
Member States must not only submit all details on inactive and active voters to ERIC every 60 days.
But they must also provide every individual in their states Motor Vehicle Department database, both licensed and ID recipients.
This combo of data is breathtaking.
It’s everyone who could generate a legal ballot.
It includes those approaching voting age, even those here illegally yet issued an ID by their left leaning State.
This data includes names, addresses, DOB, License #, last 4 of social #, voter activity, phone, email, title and type of citizenship documentation, and much more!
ERIC doesn’t just manage lists, they demand action.
But it’s not the action you would expect, like cleaning voter rolls.
ERIC provides each member State a targeted list of people that are not registered to vote.
The Membership Bylaws require the State to contact at least 95% of these people within 90 days, soliciting them to register.
ERIC also wants specific registration profiles updated and requires the State to contact these voters within 90 days too.
It’s essentially a left wing voter registration drive all paid for by the States, not the Democrat Party.
The membership fee is $25,000 but costs can run into the millions to fund the activities and membership dues.
Oddly, ERIC has no requirement or mandate that member States clean up their voter rolls.
States are only “strongly encouraged” to request ERIC’s voter updates at least once a year.
If a member fails to make a request in 425 days, the data will be sent automatically.
What’s even more odd, and seemingly corrupt, is that ERIC does NOT want to know who is voting illegally.
Their rules explain that “Under no circumstances shall the members transmit any record indicating an individual is a non-citizen of the U.S.” as stated in Exhibit A, 2b.
If ERIC hears no evil, then they see no evil.
ERIC uses advanced technology including Artificial Intelligence from Senzing.
This data matching AI compares information collected by member states with USPS address data and Social Security death records.
But no one knows how else this data collected from the 31 States is being used.
J. Christian Adams recently discussed ERIC in a Breitbart podcast interview (starts 1:16:50).
Adams says: “That’s part of the smoke screen. ERIC learns who gets registered from their program, so they’re able to micro target with whoever is partnered with ERIC.
We don’t know who their interfacing all this data with.
It could be Catalist, the massive Democrat database organization.
We just don’t know.
I’ve talked to some ERIC Board Members who are Secretary of States.
They don’t even know what ERIC is doing.
They’ve asked questions and can’t get answers.”
ERIC demands additional data, like the total number of provisional ballots cast (See Exhibit B&C).
They want totals of provisional ballots counted, provisional’s uncounted, and why.
They want to know who registered or updated their data, then voted that same day.
They require data on those who registered using paper and those using electronic methods.
They also want a list of all individuals in other agencies that perform voter registration functions.
This includes staff in Public Libraries, Department of Public Safety, Unemployment, Dept of Health, Social Services, and so on.
Member States are currently using ERIC to hide their list maintenance data, citing it violates their ERIC contracts, even though Federal law mandates it be made public.
The 1993 NVRA (Motor Voter) law includes a “Public Disclosure Provision” which allows the public inspection of “voter list maintenance records”.
The Public Interest Legal Foundation with J. Christian Adams recently sued the District of Columbia for this exact reason.
They expect to sue other States as well.
Those leading election audits should demand “Voter List Maintenance Records” by citing the Federal law U.S.C. 20507(i)(1) and not use the weaker FOIA requests for maintenance records. See DC case for details.
ERIC was funded by an “anonymous” donor and The Pew Center On The States.
This grant was provided by the George Soros Open Society. David Becker, an experienced Democrat election lawyer, left the Justice Department to create the ERIC architecture.
Originally a blue State project, ERIC had 11 member states by 2014 and 22 by 2017.
ERIC has not published an annual report since 2017, almost 5 years ago.
Becker, who still has a seat on the ERIC board, went on to create the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR) in 2016.
He distributed $69.5 million in grants from Zuckerberg for the 2020 election using similar methods as CTCL.
J. Christian Adams from PILF explains:
“The history of ERIC is important.
Kansas State Cross Check was a group of States doing this for free.
This caused leftists to go wild.
They sued Cross Check participant States, particularly Indiana, and got court orders to basically shut down Cross Check.
There’s no longer a competitor to ERIC.
Once this happened, red states started joining ERIC like GA, FL, TX.
This is what really opened the flood gates to ERIC’s power.
If a State like Georgia wants to know who’s registered in both Louisiana and Georgia, there’s no one else.
Mr. Adams also says:
“One thing we do know is ERIC is hiding the facts about how States are making these decisions.
It’s a system breakdown.
It’s a leveraging of power of who writes the rules.
It’s not just outright cheating, it’s way more sophisticated involving who has power, who can see records, who gets to vote, and who are the observers.
It’s (ERIC) a comprehensive suite manipulating the process.
And it’s not always cheating.
Sometimes it’s totally legal what they do.”
In 2016, leaked funding documents showed Soros money, partnered with the Rockefeller Family Fund, was used to push changes to voter registration policies at the national level.
Soros also gave money to Pew Center On The States for voter list maintenance practices favorable to Soros at the state level.
Soros also funded the Brennan Center for Justice and the Advancement Project.
These two groups became the loudest voices in opposing election integrity and STOPPING any effort that would ensure only U.S. citizens vote."
