Monday, October 18, 2021

Physicians Asst. Whistleblower Reveals Hospital Intake With 90 Percent Vaccinated Patients and Hospital Administration Refusing to Report Adverse Vaccine Side Effects to VAERS

 Note:
This is the best article I read in the past 24 hours.
Ms. Conrad was fired for refusing to take the COVID vaccine, based on her own hospital experiences on how many vaccine injuries there were, that were never reported to VAERS.  Reporting to VAERS is something she tried to do, voluntarily, after paid hours, following the law, but she was stopped by her hospital. She had been a Physician Assistant at United Memorial Medical Center, a hospital within the Rochester Regional Health system.
Ye Editor
 
Source:

"The central statistic in this whistleblower story is important.  

In a community with a 50% vaccination rate, 90% of the hospital admissions were vaccinated patients, and most of the critical care hospital intakes were within 14 days of the patient taking the vaccine.   

An alarmed physicians assistant began reporting those issues into the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system until the hospital administration stepped in to stop her from recording the frequency.   

She felt obligated to become a whistleblower:

“Deborah Conrad, a hospital physicians assistant on the front lines of the pandemic, pulls back the curtain on the complete lack and disregard in her hospital for reporting Covid vaccine injury to VAERS,

this country’s only mechanism to track the safety of these rushed-to-market, mandated products.


In riveting detail, including emails & recorded phone conversations, Conrad exposes the internal push to turn a blind eye to injuries and “toe the company line” that this vaccine is safe.”  

Deborah Conrad, convinced her hospital to carefully track the Covid-19 vaccination status of every patient admitted to her hospital.

The result is shocking.

As Ms. Conrad has detailed, her hospital serves a community in which less than 50% of the individuals were vaccinated for Covid-19 but yet,

during the same time period, approximately 90% of the individuals admitted to her hospital were documented to have received this vaccine.

These patients were admitted for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to COVID-19 infections.

Even more troubling is that there were many individuals who were young, many who presented with unusual or unexpected health events, and many who were admitted months after vaccination. 

 Her statement:
https://www.sirillp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Letter-Re-First-Hand-Account-of-Covid-19-Vaccine-Injuries-and-Underreporting-to-VAERS-1.pdf

My carefully selected quotes from the link above:


"We  write  with  urgency  to  provide  a  first hand  report from Ms.  Deborah  Conrad, a Physician Assistantat a regional New York hospital of serious injuries from COVID 19 vaccines and her hospital system’s failure to report to VAERS.

Ms. Conrad’s hospital  serves  a  community in  which less  than  50%  of  individuals  have received the COVID19 vaccine yet

... Even more troubling is the fact that many individuals  being  admitted are  presenting  with  complication  months  after  vaccination  and  the hospital  has  more  admitted  patients  now  on average  than it  had  last  year during  the  pandemic.
 
Even  worse  is  that  Ms.  Conrad  attests  that  even injuries  occurring  directly  after  COVID 19 vaccination  are not being reported to the CDC and FDA’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (“VAERS”).

In  fact, after  she  began  assisting doctors  and  nurses  in  her  hospital with  submission  of VAERS reports, she was prohibited by the hospital from doing so for a majority of the reports


... Underreporting to VAERS As you are aware, an AHRQ - funded study by Harvard Medical School of 715,000 patients tracked reporting to VAERS over a three-year period at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, It concluded  that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”

... the  rate  of  reporting  still appears to be only around 0.8 to 2 percent of all cases of anaphylaxis.

This  raises  serious  concerns  regarding  the  under reporting  of  adverse  events  following COVID-19 vaccination to VAERS, especially for adverse events that do not occur immediately after vaccination and where health care providers have not been specifically directed to report such adverse events to VAERS

... the  COVID-19  vaccine  has  caused  a  surge  of  admissions  to  her  hospital exceeding even that which occurred at the height of the pandemic.

,,, For the past few months, on her own time, Ms. Conrad has been assisting doctors and other medical  professionals  at  the  hospital  to  report  such  events  to  VAERS.   


Instead  of  praising  her efforts, numerous  individuals  at  the Hospital ordered Ms.  Conrad  to  stop  reporting  to  VAERS altogether unless she was submitting a report for her direct patient.

Since being given this order, Ms. Conrad has knowledge of dozens of patients whose conditions necessitate a VAERS report and whose treating  nurses  and  doctors have not  filed  a VAERS report.

This  was  entirely predictable  as  Ms.  Conrad  was, to  her  knowledge, the  only  health care  provider  at  the  Hospital submitting reports.

Requirement to Submit VAERS Reports
Health care workers are mandated by federal law to report certain medical events arising after vaccination to VAERS. 


... Hospital Prevents Ms. Conrad From Filing VAERS Reports

When Ms. Conrad observed that serious adverse events occurring directly after COVID- 19 vaccination were not being reported to VAERS, she volunteered to submit the necessary reports to VAERS on her and her colleagues’ behalf.  

Ms. Conrad was doing so after her paid shifts ended because  she  understands  the critical importance  of  the  task.
 
 
In  response,  the  Hospital  told  Ms. Conrad they were going to audit the VAERS reports that Ms. Conrad submitted because "in  [her] clinical role and as a leader in the organization”, 

she was to “support [the Hospital’s] approach to the  vaccine,” and submitting reports to VAERS apparently is contrary to its “approach to the vaccine.”

It is alarming that the Hospital’s “approach to the vaccines” does not, and has not, included educating   health care  providers   about   VAERS   and   encouraging  them  to  efficiently  and consistently file reports.  

Instead, its apparent approach is to actively deter them from doing so.


As  Ms.  Conrad  told  the  Hospital,  she  has  personally  treated at  least five  patients  that presented with new, unprovoked deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolisms within 6 weeks of COVID-19 vaccination.  

... This is Ms. Conrad’s precise concern: if she is not submitting the VAERS reports, they are not being submitted.

... Ms. Conrad reiterated that the reason she took this task on is because no one else wants to do it nor are they doing it.

... When Ms. Conrad again explained why she has the concerns she has about under reporting, she was called an anti-vaxxer by the Hospital ... "