Note:
I am 99% certain that there was enough election fraud in November 2020 to have changed the presidential winner.
All details were covered on this blog. The evidence is more than just the fact that Trump drew huge campaign crowds, while Biden barely campaigned, and drew tiny crowds. Along with the very unusual fact that Republicans in the House gained seats, as Trump "lost" the election.
Poll watchers reported unfolded absentee ballots coming in, that should have had a fold from being mailed, and some appeared to be filled out by a printing machine. In Detroit, too many ballots had only one circle next to Biden filled in -- when an alternative way of voting for Biden, requiring the same effort, was ignored? They could have filled in a single circle next to 'all Democrats' on the ballot, to vote for Biden and every other Democrat, which is common in Detroit. Hard to believe people who "voted" for Biden did not want to vote for any other Democrat (or anyone else) on the ballot.
The Bellwether County study showed that Trump won 18 or 19 counties that almost always prefer the winner, of either party. That is unprecedented in election polling history. Unbelievable, in fact.
In addition, the Post-Election Census Survey reflected an unprecedented four million more votes than people actually cast. Normally, people who are surveyed will sometimes claim to have voted, when they did not vote. So, in past surveys, there were up to nine million MORE votes claimed than were actually cast.
Another source of evidence: After midnight "ballot dumps" on Election Day, at least in in Atlanta and Detroit, caught on video, after Republican poll watchers (Democrats too, in Atlanta) were prevented from watching. Those late arriving ballots were almost entirely for Biden.
The Democrat resistance to ballot forensic audits is further proof their claims of 'the most honest election in history' are complete nonsense. They are afraid of forensic ballot audits because they ARE guilty of massive election fraud. The ballot examination methodology of Jovan Pulitzer is worth listening to.
Ye Editor
"Jovan Pulitzer gave an excellent interview yesterday on the morning radio show ‘Tomorrow’s News Today’ with Joe Hoft at St. Louis Real Talk radio station 93.3.
Pulitzer is the first pundit after the 2020 election to encourage Americans to focus on the ballots.
His ideas and arguments surrounding forensically auditing the ballots in the election made sense.
He argued that the ballots were tangible assets that could be provided in a court of law and that and deficiencies in paper, ink, counts, folds, layouts or other areas could easily be identified and explained in court.
For example, absentee ballots that don’t have folds, never made it through the mail. Items like this are easily identified and isolated as invalid.
We encouraged President Trump to order these forensic audits across the states where he suddenly lost early in the morning of November 4th.
It didn’t happen.
However, the patriots in Arizona did believe in Pulitzer’s argument and they fought for a forensic audit in Arizona and the Senate eventually obliged.
This Friday the results of this exercise are expected.
Pulitzer was on with Joe Hoft and his co-host Kell Brazil on the morning radio show ‘Tomorrow’s News Today’ at St. Louis Real Talk radio station 93.3 on Friday.
The interview was very entertaining but also there were numerous bits of information for listeners.
Pulitzer shared:
I think you need to prepare for the reality it’s going to be big.
That’s item one.
You’re going to want to pay attention to if the Senate for any reason left any findings out.
That’s going to be important and you’re going to want to know that.
You’re going to want to ask that question.
Sometimes it’s not about what is in, it’s about what didn’t make it in, for whatever reason.
Not that this is going to happen.
I still believe it’s going to be monumental.
I believe it’s the first time history that the American people or the people of the world, this is the first time this has ever occurred…
…So for the very first time you’re really going to see how sick this system is that we call our election and voting system.
It’s about as efficient as a 1980’s fax machine.
And you’re going to look at it and go wow why didn’t we do anything with it,
and they’re going to try to say well that’s not really what it looks like and that’s not really what it is and that’s not how it happened.
And as long as you understand that the media does have a horse in this game and their game is to tell you you’re an idiot and you’re a conspiracy theorist.
As long as you can put that aside and believe with your own eyes and if you can understand how it’s done,
which I’m trying to teach people how it’s done, here it is or whatever,
then your eyes are open and when your eyes are open they’ll never be shut again.
That’s what this drill and exercise is and that’s why this is the most important time in history to be alive…
Next Pulitzer described what you can do and then he shared this when the issue of a Californian identifying a voting discrepancy was raised:
You know what’s interesting, you’re responsible for that.
Did you know that?
Not that you made the ballots, but the Gateway Pundit’s responsible for it because you did an interview with me.
I taught people how to recalibration.
What to look for in a ballot, and now you have smart voters all over the state of California before the election sending us photos of their ballots.
You’ve made a difference in the history of people by teaching them to look at their ballots.
For the first time in history people were smart enough to really look at that instrument that was sent to them and identify all the ways it was crooked.
Pulitzer then talked about your rights being violated under equal rights under the law.
The remaining interview was exceptional and hopeful and honest.
“We save the country, we save the world.” "
