Government
conspiracies
have happened
many times before
in American history.
Sometimes the
mass media
participates.
Other times
they are
kept in the dark.
And so are we.
Confusing the issue,
there are far more
false conspiracy
theories.
Many about 9/11,
and many about the
President Kennedy
assassination.
Two big conspiracies
are in progress now.
Both led by
leftist politicians
and government
bureaucrats,
supported by
over 95%
of the mass media,
that is leftist biased.
One conspiracy started
in the 1970s (the coming
climate change crisis),
and has gone global.
The other started
in early 2016
(trying to retire
President Trump).
The root cause is that
leftists strongly believe
they are morally superior.
That's why they so often
"debate" Republicans,
Conservatives,
and even Libertarians
like me, with ridicule
and character attacks.
They attack our character
to make us, in their eyes,
unworthy of debate.
Other people that
they generally dislike
are corporate CEO's,
with some exceptions,
and people who fight back.
Donald Trump is
a unique mixture
of everything
leftists oppose!
That's why
he makes
them crazy !
Plus some attributes
most people don't like:
Excessive bragging
about himself,
exaggerating his
accomplishments,
and unable to build
a coalition ( to jointly
attack China's unfair
trade practices,
for example,
rather than being
a one man show ).
Nasty Nasty Pelosi,
and her very
famous lapdog,
Adam "Shifty" Schiff,
are now leading
the latest chapter
of a political coup
against Trump.
The coup started
when Donald Trump
angered the CIA's
John Brennan,
in early 2016,
and he's been
angry ever since.
Brennan asked the
intelligence operations
in several other nations
if they had "dirt" on Trump.
I assume none was found,
because Brennan
then began pressuring
the FBI to investigate Trump.
At the time,
the FBI was
pretending
to investigate
Hillary Clinton.
They probably
started work
in Spring 2016,
but the investigation
candidate Trump
was not "official"
until after Hilary
was exonerated
in early July 2016.
That was a strange day.
The FBI's James Comey
took over for the Obama
Justice Department,
told the country that
Clinton vroke even more
laws than Republicans
had claimed, and then
decided on no punishment.
Comey made himself
the judge and jury,
with a conclusion Obama
had talked about indirectly
on television.
I can't stand the Clintons,
because Bill is a sex maniac,
and they are both grifters,
( extremely rich grifters ),
but a traditional investigation
would have said nothing bad
about Hillary because she was
not charged with any crimes.
Strangely, James Comey was
a Clinton fan, and hated Trump.
The official FBI investigation
of Trump, Operation Crossfire,
was an unjustified counter
intelligence operation.
There was a conspiracy among
quite a few high level Obama
appointees, very likely including
Obama himself, to prevent Trump
from becoming president.
And that conspiracy
was unprecedented
in American history
The goal was to find
enough "dirt" on Trump
to derail his campaign.
But there was
no useful dirt
to be found.
Any details about
Donald Trump's
"other women"
wouldn't work well
with "womanizer"
Bill Clinton's
"wife" running
against Trump.
I'm confident Obama
gave the orders
that Hillary Clinton
was to get absolutely
no punishment
for her very obvious
obstruction of justice.
Obama actually said
something close to that
on television, as if he was
instructing his gang.
Fortunately,
the Obama insiders
were so incompetent,
especially James Comey,
that they managed to hurt
Hillary's campaign
more than Trumps!
Poetic justice.
Today's impeachment
"circus" is just the
latest attempt
by Democrats
to overthrow the
federal government
from the inside.
It won't work because
"Nasty" and "Shifty"
are incompetent.
They are incompetent
because they "forgot"
that impeachment
requires a crime.
Donald Trump,
the most investigated
president in U.S. history,
may have a rough,
annoying and
combative personality,
but he has not
committed a crime!
No amount of lying
by Democrats
will change that fact.
If you impeach
someone who has
not committed
a "high crime",
or any crime,
that act is likely
to backfire.
Passing articles
of impeachment
over to the Senate
would be so
counterproductive
that no Democrat
with sense
would do that.
But with Democrats
suffering from "Trump
Derangement Syndrome"
for the past three years,
their common sense
may be long gone.
The Republican
controlled Senate
is ready to investigate
the Biden crime family --
with three grifters
(two Biden sons,
and one brother).
They have raked in
tens of millions
of dollars
from companies
buying influence
with Senator Biden
(including Amtrak),
and later with
Vice President Biden
(including Burisma
in Ukraine).
Does Nancy Pelosi
really want Joe Biden
investigated before the
Democrat convention?
Information about how
Joe Biden helped Amtrak,
Burisma, and other companies
his family collected checks from,
is just beginning to surface.
A Biden investigation
is needed by the
Justice Department.
Republicans in the Senate
would have a different type
of investigation -- not secret
-- they'd question witnesses
in public.
Joe Biden did not sell access
as well as the now extremely
rich Clintons did, with their
so called "foundation",
now losing money!
The Foundation spent 90%
of "donations", for the year
I found tax records,
on it's employees salaries,
travel, room and board,
and only 10% on real charity
(the minimum required by law).
So brazen
were the Clintons,
that FOREIGN money
poured in while
Hillary Clinton was
Secretary of State
(a Wall Street Journal
report identified $9 million),
and expected to be
the next president
after Obama.
Donations have fallen
by 90% since 2009,
and it may mean nothing,
but people in Ukraine
"gave" more to the
Clinton Foundation,
than people from
any other nation !
The Democrats
don't even pretend
their impeachment
circus is fair.
Or about fact finding.
They block Republican
requests for witnesses.
They block Republican
questions they don't like.
By "they", I mean
Adam "Shifty" Schiff.
The circus is happening
because it can happen.
It's partisan politics.
It gives the "Deep State"
(Democrat bureaucrats
working in the government)
an opportunity to complain
that Donald Trump does
foreign policy his way,
and doesn't listen to them
(implying they are experts,
and Trump is a fool).
It gives the 95%
pro-Democrat
mainstream media
an opportunity
to attack Trump
with new material.
New material
is coming from
Deep State employees,
who did not witness
any crime, but were
called in by
Adam "Shifty" Schiff
as witnesses anyway.
It seems that
"Deep State"
employees
resisted
following orders
from their boss,
President Trump.
After listening to them
whine about Trump's
foreign policy
being "irregular",
I recommend that
Trump cut the
State Department
payroll by about
80% to 90%.
In 2016, when the
Russian collusion
charges started,
I was suspicious.
Not because
leftists lie so often.
Which they do.
But because Trump
is not the colluding type.
He attacked
fellow Republicans
in 2016, and really
did not collude
with the Republican
Party.
Trump was supposed
to collude with his Party!
John McCain later
paid Trump back,
by saving ObamaCare.
Before 2016 ended,
I identified the Russian
Collusion charge as false,
in this blog.
I later identified
the Mueller Team
as ONLY Democrats,
investigating ONLY
Republicans.
Obvious bias.
Said they would
find no collusion.
Russian interference
with the 2016 election
was found to be small
and ineffective.
I'd have kept quiet
about it, to avoid
embarrassing
the Russians
about their lame
2016 effort,
motivating them
to try harder in 2020.
The claim that
Russia hacked
the Democrat
National
Committee
(DNC) emails
is a lie, with no
supporting
evidence.
It is very suspicious the DNC
refused to allow the friendly
Obama FBI near their
computers and servers.
The computer company
the DNC hired, CrowdStrike,
was infamous in the industry
for falsely claiming
they were so smart
hey knew what country
a hacker was located in.
In fact, the country of origin
is just a wild guess, unless
the hacker is caught in the act,
which is rare.
CeowdStrike always
claimed it was a country
that won't cooperate
with an investigation,
such as Russia, China,
or North Korea.
CrowdStrike did it again,
by blaming Russia,
(either their usual wild guess,
which clients seem to love,
or the DNC asked them
for that narrative).
CrowdStrike's claim
is not proof of anything.
Hillary lost in 2016
because she treated
the mid-west states
as fly over country.
Her own dozens of excuses
are self-serving nonsense.
The "impeachment inquiry"
is a "political circus" and
"kangaroo court".
It has been so ineffective
that it makes the failed
Mueller Report look good.
Adam "Shifty" Schiff
is so biased, lies so often,
and makes both so obvious,
that he makes Robert Mueller
look good.
And Mueller seemed to have
little connection to the report
named after him.
If anything is learned
from this congressional circus,
it is an understanding of why
President Obama fired every
U.S. Ambassador on his
first day as President.
"Shifty" Schiff repeatedly
lied to the public about
having evidence of Trump's
collusion with Russia,
for almost three years!
Adam "Shifty" Schiff's
"political theater"
is a hearsay circus
of State Department
bureaucrats
who don't like Trump,
and his policies.
How dare a president
set his own foreign policy,
they strongly imply!
Early witnesses
never met Trump,
and did not hear
his July 25, 2019
phone call to the
Ukraine president.
So why were they testifying?
One diplomat
who disagreed
with Trump,
had been fired
by Trump two months
before the phone call.
The diplomats
were there for
hearsay-based
complaints about
Trump's foreign
policy.
I listened for
the first four hours.
That was four hours
of my life wasted,
that I'll never get back.
Instead of listening
to the remaining
live testimony,
I read about it online,
though November 18,
then wrote this article.
It seems to me
that Democrats
have been irrational
for over three years.
And not only for
loving socialism,
open borders and
the Green New Deal.
That's already
three strikes,
in my book.
Also consider
that Joe Biden,
head of the
Biden crime family
(details later),
is still doing well
in the polls.
Democrats have
falsely accused
President Trump
of Russian collusion,
obstruction of justice
(Russia),
and then a Ukraine
quid pro quo (extortion),
obstruction of justice,
(quid pro quo) bribery,
and now we hear about
witness intimidation.
Bribery actually includes
a quid pro quo, but the word
"bribery" tested better
in a Democrat focus group.
I'm not kidding.
Considering Trump's
unusual leadership style,
which is rough and combative,
and the Trump Derangement
Syndrome he causes
among Democrats:
It feels to me like
inmates (politicians)
are running an asylum
(the U.S. government).
Nowhere is that
more obvious than
in the "impeachment
inquiry", an opportunity
for many Democrat
bureaucrats to come in
and complain that
President Trump thinks
he's the leader of U.S.
foreign policy, not them.
How dare he do that?
Well,
maybe because
Trump IS the leader
of foreign policy.
Complain about Trump's
unique foreign policies,
if you want, but he hasn't
done anything really stupid,
such as sending $150 billion
to Iran, like Obama did.
A highlight from the
"impeachment circus":
Jim Jordan,
Republican Congressman
vs. Bill Taylor,
diplomat:
Jordan:
You didn’t listen in on
President Trump &
(president) Zelensky’s call?
Taylor:
I did not.
Jordan:
You’ve never talked
with Chief of Staff Mulvaney?
Taylor:
I never did.
Jordan:
You’ve never met the President?
Taylor:
That’s correct.
Jordan:
And you’re their star witness?
From Ukraine's point of view:
U.S. military assistance
significantly increased
under President Trump.
President Obama
had refused
to send Ukraine
lethal weapons
when they were
desperately needed.
And Obama
watched helplessly
as Russia seized
Crimea from Ukraine.
Trump's $400 million
of military aid
WAS released
to Ukraine, by Trump,
on September 11, 2019.
That was less than
two weeks after
Ukraine was first told
about a "hold", on
August 29, by the
U.S. Ambassador
to Ukraine.
There were
no conditions
for Ukraine
getting the
military aid.
Ukraine was asked,
but never investigated,
Joe Biden, Hunter Biden,
and Ukraine interference
with the 2016 U.S. election.
Democrats were very
"concerned" about
Russian interference
with the 2016 election.
But not concerned
about Ukraine
interference
in 2016?
The Ukraine president
repeatedly told the media
"there was no pressure on me".
There was no quid pro quo.
No conditions were required
for getting lethal military aid,
that Obama had blocked.
I hope our nation never
gives away hundreds
of millions of dollars
of military aid,
asking absolutely
NOTHING in return.
That makes no sense.
Especially for Ukraine,
with their reputation
for corruption.
For Ukraine, we had a 2018
video confession by former VP
Joe Biden, bragging about
shutting down a Ukraine
investigation including
his son, in 2016, when Joe
was the U.S. Vice President,
and Obama's "point man"
on Ukraine.
THE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY
Ukraine has a history
of corruption.
Joe Biden claims that
the Ukraine prosecutor
was corrupt.
He offers no
specific proof
of that claim.
I suppose the act
of investigating
Hunter Biden
makes a
Ukraine
prosecutor
"corrupt"?
In fact, it was Joe Biden
who was corrupt --
he looked the other way
as Hunter Biden and his
business partner,
Devon Archer,
were both getting
huge bribes,
starting in 2014,
from Burisma,
a Ukraine
energy company
known to be corrupt.
Burisma is
Ukraine's
second-largest
privately owned
energy company.
"The boys" never
even attended the
Burism board
meetings.
They got
huge payments
for a "no show job".
How nice for them!
The mainstream media
has reported $50,000
per month for each man.
The excellent
investigative reporter
Peter Schweitzer,
accessed U.S.
court records
for a case
Devon Archer
lost this year,
and he reports
$83,333 per month
for each man.
Investigative
reporter
John Solomon
independently
confirmed
that number:
"Bank records obtained by the FBI
in an unrelated case show that
between May 2014 and the end of 2015,
Hunter Biden’s and Archer’s firm
received monthly consulting
payments totaling $166,666 a month,
or more than triple the $50,000
cited by the mainstream media."
I assume
the $166,666
meant $83,333
for Hunter Biden,
and $83,333
for Devon Archer,
each month.
But it may be
a lot more
than $93,333.
Documents
allegedly leaked
by the Ukrainian
General Prosecutor's
office to CD Media,
revealed payments
by Ukraine's Burisma
Holdings to Rosemont
Seneca Bohai LLC,
a corporation
controlled by
Hunter Biden
and Devon Archer,
his business partner,
and fellow (former)
Burisma board member.
Rosemont Seneca Bohai
bank records reveal
that it was a slush fund
used for payments
to Biden and Archer,
expensive toys,
an investment in
an ill-fated Indian tribe
scheme, and other
expenses.
Archer was a Yale roommate
of John Kerry's stepson
Chris Heinz - the two of them
opened investment firm
Rosemont Capital
with Joe Biden's son,
Hunter.
Rosemont Capital is the
parent company of
Rosemont Seneca
Partners, LLC
- the entity which received
the Burisma payments.
I wonder if appropriate taxes
were paid on those "earnings"?
The leaked records show
45 payments between
November 2014 and
November 2015,
totaling $3.5 million,
mostly in increments
of $83,333.33.
Assuming the money
was meant for both
Biden and Archer,
$3.5 million spread
over 12 months,
is $145,833
per month
for each man.
Or $97,222 per month
for all three men,
if Chris Heinz was
was sharing the loot.
The payments
correspond
to Morgan Stanley
bank records
the New York Times
reported on
earlier this year.
They were submitted
as evidence in a case
against Devon Archer,
who was convicted in
a scheme to defraud
pension funds
of an Indian tribe, of
tens of millions of dollars.
But Archer's conviction
was suspiciously overturned
in November, by a judge
who felt that he may not have
willingly participated
in the scheme ?
"Quid Pro Quo"
Joe Biden
had been
put in charge
of Ukraine policy
by President
Obama in 2014.
Soon after that,
Hunter Biden
and Devon Archer
became Burisma
board members.
In 2016, Joe Biden got
the top Ukraine prosecutor
fired, immediately halting
his investigation of Burisma,
Hunter Biden, and Devon Archer.
That investigation
was bnever restarted,
even after Trump made
a polite request during his
July 25, 2019 phone call.
Joe Biden had threatened
the then Ukraine president
with withholding $1 billion
of U.S. aid (a loan guarantee
that Ukraine desperately
needed, to buy military
equipment, for their war
with Russia).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXA--dj2-CY
Joe Biden's son Hunter,
'and his business partner
Devon Archer, both had no
energy industry experience,
yet were being paid huge
monthly sums to be board
"members" at Burisma,
a known to be corrupt
Ukraine company.
There is no evidence
either man ever attended
Burisma board meetings,
and, In fact, both men were
worth next to nothing
to Burisma, EXCEPT for
their connection
to VP Joe Biden.
No Democrat is interested
in the Biden crime family,
with a quid pro quo crime
actually confessed to
on a 2018 video.
Biden committed
the same type of crime
President Trump
is accused of,
but did NOT commit.
It is a Democrat conspiracy
to completely ignore the
July 2019 President Trump
- Ukraine president phone
call transcript, and the 2018
Joe Biden video.
Democrats often
dismiss things
they don't like, as a
"conspiracy theory".
But they completely
overlook their own
conspiracy,
to continuously
investigate Trump.
And then impeach him
for something, anything,
even something that is
not a crime at all.
Which the House Democrats
can do with a majority vote,
anytime they want to,
for any reason.
The Democrat leaker,
"Mr. CIA Whistleblower"
(who Senator Rand Paul
has said is Eric Ciaramella),
presented only second
and third hand information,
often contradicted by the
Trump phone call transcript
released later.
He is not a real whistleblower,
with first hand information.
And a whistleblower's name
does not have to be kept secret.
That's a myth.
Ciaramella
had previously
worked with
VP Joe Biden,
Susan Rice,
John Brennan, and
Alexandra Chalupa,
a Ukrainian-born
Democratic National
Committee official
charged during
the 2016 campaign
with digging up dirt
on candidate
Donald Trump.
Paul Sperry’s reporting,
in Real Clear Investigations,
revealed that Ciaramella
met with the staff of
Rep. Adam Schiff,
the House Democrat
who is leading the
impeachment process,
one month prior to filing
"his" complaint with the
CIA’s inspector general.
Liar Schiff stated,
on the record,
that the staff of the
House Intelligence
Committee,
which he heads,
had no contact with
the whistleblower.
A real whistleblower
has charged
"Mr. CIA Whistleblower"
with allowing his lawyer
to set up a Go Fund Me
account for his legal fees.
It already contains
more than $250,000,
from 6,000 donors,
many not giving their name.
Using that money,
intended for him,
would bea serious crime
for "Mr. CIA Whistleblower"
-- a government employee
taking a bribe.
The Office of Government Ethics
(OGE) warned federal government
employees earlier this year that they
"may not accept any gift given
because of the employee's
official position,"
meaning that the gift would
"not have been given
had the employee
not held the status,
authority, or duties
associated with the
employee's federal position."
( Note that Christine Blasey Ford,
not a government employee,
and whose lawyers said
they were not charging her,
received at least
one million dollars
from a Go Fund Me account,
as a reward for her brazen lying
about Judge Kavanaugh's
teen age years. Typical
sleazy Democrats behavior ! )
Democrat Adam
"Shifty" Schiff
had been running
a secret "court"
in the House basement,
where Republicans
were not allowed
to call witnesses.
"Shifty" Schiff,
and/or his staff,
coached the
"CIA Whistleblower"
before "his" letter,
and then lied about that.
The "CIA Whistleblower"
knew at least two members
of Schiff's staff.
That was BEFORE
some lawyers wrote
a letter that the
"whistleblower"
merely signed.
"Shifty" Schiff also
coached witnesses
before they appeared
at the "basement court",
and Schiff cut off many
Republican questions
that he did not like.
That adds up to
a "kangaroo court".
This is a low point
in American history.
Led by a smarmy
Democrat Party,
clearly suffering from
Trump Derangement
Syndrome.
Democrats are hoping
a House impeachment,
even without
a Senate conviction,
will be enough
to help a Democrat
become the
next president.
Stop to consider
what that means
for your investments
-- because all
leading Democrats
are now socialists.
Investigative reporter
John Solomon reports
that the Ukrainian embassy
in Washington told him on April
"that a Democratic National Committee contractor named Alexandra Chalupa did, in fact, solicit dirt on Donald Trump and Paul Manafort during the spring of 2016 in hopes of spurring a pre-election congressional hearing into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia. The embassy also stated Chalupa tried to get Ukraine’s president at the time, Petro Poroshenko, to do an interview on Manafort with an American investigative reporter working on the issue. The embassy said it turned down both requests"
The transcript of the July 2019
phone call between President Trump,
and the Ukraine president,
has no evidence of any crime.
The Justice Department
confirmed that.
Also:
-- Ukraine got the $400 million
of military aid from Trump
(the Obama Administration denied
Ukraine all lethal military aid)
-- Ukraine got that aid
without investigating
Ukraine interference
with the 2016 U.S. election,
or the Bidens.
-- The Ukraine president
has repeatedly said
he was not pressured
-- The Ukraine president
said no one in Ukraine
knew U.S. military aid
had been delayed
until over one month
AFTER the phone call,
and the hold on
releasing the aid
was less than
two weeks later.
-- It is President Trump's job,
as chief law enforcement officer
of the U.S., to make sure
Joe Biden was investigated
for the 2016 Ukraine
extortion crime that
he bragged about on video.
-- It is President Trump's job,
along with his Justice Department,
to ask foreign nations
for help investigating crimes
by U.S. citizens, or interference
in a U.S. election, when there is
evidence of a crime.
The Joe Biden video
is strong evidence
-- it's a voluntary
confession.
-- It would be unethical,
and possibly a crime,
for President Trump
and his
Justice Department
to completely ignore
the Joe Biden
video confession.
The U.S. mass media
would be in a huge uproar
if Biden had been
a Republican.
A good saying in science is:
"You're entitled t
o your own opinion,
but not your own facts."
In this case, Democrats
have their own opinions,
and they treat government
bureaucrat opinions,
based on hearsay,
as real facts.
This is not
typical politics,
because there's
no evidence
of a real crime.
Truth has NOT
been required
for three years
of relentless
attacks on Trump.
And 95%
of the mass media
doesn't care about truth,
or about evidence --
they'll publish
anything
Democrats say
to smear Trump.
This is a 'civil war'
(some say a "coup"),
and it is getting worse
as the 2020 election
approaches.
This conspiracy
to "get Trump"
started in early 2016,
within the Obama
Administration.
Both 2016
presidential candidates
were being investigated
by the FBI in 2016.
Think about that !
The Hillary Clinton
"investigation"
was justified for
destroying evidence
demanded with a
Congressional
subpoena.
Destroying
tens of thousands
of e-mails is an obvious
obstruction of justice.
But it was a fake
FBI investigation.
No punishment
for Hillary Clinton
was decided in advance.
The FBI's James Comey
wrote the first draft of his
"Hillary exoneration speech"
before witnesses were i
nterviewed by the FBI.
The Trump investigations
were never justified --
no evidence of any crime.
And that's still true.
The Obama intelligence
community pushed
the Obama FBI
to investigate anything,
and everyone, involved in
the Trump campaign.
Investigations ramped up
after Trump won the election.
And they are going
full speed ahead now.
There's incredible
mass media bias
-- 96% of recent articles
about President Trump
have been negative
(Media Research Center).
95% of the mass media,
and Democrat politicians,
often use identical phrases
when criticizing Trump,
demonstrating collusion.
Trump's crime?
Getting elected in 2016.
It's about the 350 days
until the next election.
This conspiracy
could help decide
who get elected,
which would make
a signifiant
difference
in your life.
Because all
the Democrats
are socialists.
The secret Congressional
committee testimony,
seem like practice
sessions for the
televised testimony.
After
each witness,
Democrat
Congressmen
tell the media:
'This is really bad'.
The few Republicans
willing to talk, say:
'There's no crime here'.
There has to be
a conspiracy
for Democrats to talk
with one voice,
while they completely
ignore the transcript
of President Trump's
Ukraine conversation,
and the 2018 Joe Biden
video "confession".
The U.S. Justice
Department has studied
the phone call transcript
(as I have), and stated
the obvious:
There is no crime.
The corrupt Obama
Administration
was, fortunately,
too incompetent
to help Hillary
Clinton win in 2016.
But they sure tried.
After Trump won,
the Mueller Team
of ALL Democrats,
investigating
ONLY Republicans,
and found nothing
in 22 months.
Of course
they waited
until AFTER
the 2018 election
to tell voters
what they
already knew
one year earlier
-- Trump was not
guilty of anything.
Their silence
before the 2018 election
helped Democrats
gain control of the House.
Smarmy Democrats
kept their fake Russian
collusion charges alive
for three years,
and still believe them.
In fact, "Russian collusion"
was invented 'out of thin air'
by the Hillary Clinton campaign
in 2016, to deflect attention
away from leaked Democrat
National Committee e-Mails
published by WikiLeaks.
Trump has
a rough personality,
and seems to love
verbal fights
with opponents.
But in comparison,
Democrats are worse.
And not only because
they love socialism, a
and support the worst
socialist proposal
in American history
-- The Green New Deal
( a large majority of
the proposed spending
is for social engineering,
completely unrelated
to CO2 emissions
reductions ).
Democrats have no limits
on what vulgar names
they will call Trump on TV.
Their character attacks
are disgusting.
The same people
were very intolerant
of any criticism
of President Obama.
And they looked
the other way
when President
Clinton faced
credible charges
of sex with a young
White House intern,
sexual harassment
of several women,
exposing himself
to one woman,
who he paid
over $800,000
to shut up,
and rape.
Truth does
not matter
to Democrats.
They launch harsh
character attacks,
and sometimes
physical attacks,
on voters who
preferred Trump.
Over 95% of the
mainstream media
will publish anything
that makes Trump
look bad.
No fact checking
is required.
The 95%
pro-Democrat
biased media
verifies nothing
claimed by
a Democrat.
And they
never apologize
for errors,
and fake news.
Being a leftist means
you never have to say
you're sorry!
And they avoid
publishing anything
that would make Trump
look good, whenever
that's possible.
In the 2016
presidential campaign,
95% of government
bureaucrats' donations
went to Hillary Clinton,
according to The Hill's
analysis of donations
from federal workers,
up until September 2016.
The percentage was 97%
at the Obama Department
of Justice, and 99%, at the
Obama State Department.
The Senate Committee
on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs,
reported that in Trump's
first 126 days in office,
his administration faced
125 leaked stories --
one leak a day,
containing information
potentially damaging
to national security.
Why is this
conspiracy
important?
Because Trump favors
free markets, and all
leading Democrat
candidates are
socialists.
Although only
Bernie Sanders
admits to to
being a socialist
in public.
Candidate Obama,
back in 2008,
was the furthest left
of all 435
Congressional
members.
But when compared with
Democrat candidates today,
Obama in 2008 seems closer
to a moderate.
The 2020 election
could have a large effect
on your investments.
Everything Trump has done,
that was pro-business,
could be reversed
by a new Democrat president.
Trump's trade war tariffs
are not a free market policy,
unless they are temporary,
and cause reduced
trade barriers.
Concerning intellectual
property (IP) theft,
and forced technology
sharing with U.S.
business partners:
China has not even
admitted their IP theft
is a problem.
But they have made
incredible progress
upgrading their military
weapons, in the past
two decades.
Such very high technology
weapons would not exist
in China without IP theft.
It's hard to believe China
would stop the IP theft
that allows them
to significantly upgrade
their military power.
The Mueller Team's
Russian Collusion
Delusion failed
for the Democrats.
There was no crime.
Ukraine is 'act two'.
A weak act two.
There was no crime.
But there is
a conspiracy,
among Democrats,
to continuously investigate
Trump, continuously imply
he has committed a crime,
declare "obstruction of justice"
every time Trump objects
to the false charges, and
not credit him for anything
good that happens
when he is president.
There was even a lot of
Democrat criticism
of Trump after the
ISIS leader was killed.
Every TV station,
other than Fox News,
repeatedly claims,
or at least implies,
Trump has committed
an impeachable crime.
But he has not.
Not even close.
No president
in American history
has been the subject
of so many partisan
investigations,
starting in early 2016,
and apparently
never ending.
Over three years
of investigations
won't stop for the lack
of real evidence
of a crime.
The lies about Trump
(even worse lies
were told about
Judge Kavanugh)
are well documented
in many articles
in this politics blog:
I identified the
Russian Collusion Hoax
in late 2016, two and one
half years before the
Mueller Team found
no Russian collusion.
Democrats treat
Donald Trump
as if winning
the 2016 election
was a crime!
In the shady world
of the Clintons,
and Joe Biden,
politicians have
found ways to get
very rich, in ways
they expect will not
be prosecuted.
They sell influence
to bring money
into their
"foundation",
or they get
family members
placed into
very high paying --
jobs they could
never get
on their
own merits.
"Conspiracy Theory"
has a very negative
connotation.
Many times
that's deserved.
But the attack
on President Trump
consists of one
evidence-free charge
after another,
by angry Democrats.
Two and one half years
of a fake Russian
collusion conspiracy.
Now replaced by a fake
Ukraine quid pro quo,
or bribery, or obstruction
of justice, conspiracy,
based ONLY on biased
OPINIONS and HEARSAY,
from "Deep State"
Democrat bureaucrats
who hate Trump.
Not based on the words
in a transcript of the
Trump Ukraine phone call.
Will the Democrat conspiracy
affect the 2020 election?
It has to.
Explanation:
I try to watch a half hour
of ABC news (anti-Trump,
although not as bad
as CNN or MSNBC)
and a half hour
of Fox opinion shows
(pro-Trump between
8pm and 11pm --
but the actual news,
presented at earlier
hours, is neutral).
What's heard from
both TV sources,
on the same night,
is very different.
The Joe Biden Ukraine
crime confession video
is frequently played
on Fox opinion shows,
but never even mentioned
on ABC news.
Many non-Fox
TV listeners
have heard almost
nothing good about
President Trump.
since he was elected.
That has to affect
the 2020 election.
Democrats seem likely
to impeach President Trump,
while they, and every TV network
except Fox, completely ignore
the 2018 Joe Biden video.
Biden brags about threatening
to withhold a $1 billion US
loan guarantee, unless a
Ukraine prosecutor is fired
by the Ukraine president,
within six hours.
And the Ukraine prosecutor
WAS fired within hours.
But no Democrat
seems to care about
Biden bragging about
his quid pro quo
extortion, to shield
his son from an
investigation.t
The Ukraine prosecutor's
"crime" had been
investigating a Ukraine
energy company for fraud,
including why
they were paying
both Hunter Biden,
and his business partner
Devon Archer, at least
$83,000 a month --
to be listed as
Burisma Board members
... obviously to curry favor
with Hunter Biden's father,
VP Joe Biden!
There is no evidence
Hunter Biden and Devon Archer
ever attended a board meeting,
and they certainly knew nothing
about the energy industry.
But never mind
Joe Biden's
actual crime
confession
on video.
Democrats
won't investigate
fellow Democrats,
unless forced to
by public opinion.
And then they'll pretend
to investigate, and decide
on no punishment
(Hillary Clinton in 2016).
