Sunday, October 13, 2019

Inspector General Michael Horowitz is a Democrat, with a history of "pulling punches"

Expect a biased
IG investigation
report:

Justice Department 
Inspector General 
Michael Horowitz
has a long history 
of pulling punches, 
to protect the
deep state,
according to 
RealClear 
Investigations' 
Paul Sperry.  

Horowitz had
"volunteered on the 
political campaigns 
of several Democrats 
while in college 
and later donated 
to the campaign 
of Colorado Sen. 
Michael Bennet, 
a former colleague 
who is seeking the 
2020 Democratic 
presidential nomination
 – and who has slammed 
Trump's praise of Russian 
President Vladimir Putin."

Horowitz is married to a 
former Democrat political 
activist, and Obama donor, 
Alexandra Kauffman Horowitz, 
who helped run campaigns 
for liberal Democrats, 
before producing content 
for CNN's Washington 
bureau. 

James Comey 
illegally leaked 
classified information 
to the New York Times.

He admitted it.

But Horowitz 
accepted Comey's 
weak argument 
that the memo 
of a conversation 
with President Trump 
was sensitive,
but “not classified” – 
even though the memo 
contained information 
about the FBI's ongoing 
counterintelligence 
investigation of the 
president’s national 
security adviser
Michael Flynn. 

"I see a pattern of him 
    ( Horowitz )
pulling up short 
and trying to be 
a bit of a statesman 
instead of making 
the hard calls," 
said a 24-year 
FBI veteran, 
Chris Swecker,
who served as 
assistant director 
of its criminal 
investigative 
division: 
"I’m afraid he’s going 
to do the same thing 
with the FISA report 
– a finding 
that sounds tough, 
but in the end, 
'No harm, no foul.’"



Horowitz hasn't 
even interviewed 
Carter Page, the
victim of the FBI,
thanks to abuses 
of the Foreign Intelligence 
Surveillance Act (FISA) !

Horowitz says he conducted 
more than 100 interviews 
of witnesses, (but he)
... failed to interview Page, 
the alleged victim of a 
controversial FISA warrant. 

RealClearInvestigations 
found many instances 
of Horowitz 
stopping short 
of pursuing evidence, 
and being content 
to take high-level officials 
at their word, even in 
the face of conflicting
evidence. 

Horowitz gave former 
FBI Deputy Director 
Andrew McCabe 
special treatment,
accepting McCabe's 
claim that he had 
nothing to do with
his wife's Senate 
campaign, even 
though he: 

-- Personally met with her sponsor 
and fundraiser Terry McAulliffe;

-- Drove her to campaign stops;

-- Attended one of her 
candidate debates;

-- Discussed the campaign 
with her on FBI equipment;

-- Appeared in a family photo 
used in a campaign mailer; 
and,

-- Posed with her 
wearing her official 
campaign T-shirt 
for a photo distributed 
on social media 
to promote 
her candidacy.

Paul Sperry asks:
"Were such actions 
violations of 
the Hatch Act, 
a federal law 
that prohibits 
federal employees 
from engaging 
“in political activity 
in an official capacity 
at any time”? 

If so, the topic 
didn’t interest 
Horowitz, 
who accepted 
on face value the FBI’s 
argument in a letter 
to the Senate that he 
played no formal role 
in his wife’s campaign, 
and that his activities 
were permissible 
under the law."

"Everybody 
and their mother 
knew he (McCabe) 
was engaged in 
political activities," 
said the former 
Pentagon IG General 
Joseph E. Schmitz. 



During his 17-month probe 
into the FBI's investigation 
of Hillary Clinton's emails, 
Horowitz repeatedly declined 
to use his subpoena power 
- he allowed key players 
to provide their own evidence !

Horowitz also allowed 
two lead FBI officials, 
Peter Strzok 
and Lisa Page, 
to sort through 
which of 
their electronic 
communications 
were "personal" 
vs. "work related", 
according to 
the report. 

"The inspector general 
and I arranged 
an agreement 
where I would 
go through 
my personal accounts 
and identify 
any material 
that was relevant 
to FBI business 
and turn it over,” 
Strzok said, 
while testifying 
before Congress. 

Michael Horowitz 
did criticize both
Strzok and Page 
for their obvious 
"political bias," 
however 
he concluded 
that their 
clear preference 
for Hillary Clinton, 
and against 
Donald Trump, 
did not influence 
their investigations,
despite the fact that 
an August 2016 text 
from Strzok to Page 
strongly suggests 
they were actively 
working against Trump: 

"[Trump’s] not ever going 
to become president, right? 
Right?!"
Page asked Strzok, 
to which he replied 
"No. 
No he won't. 
We’ll stop it."

Horowitz essentially 
cleared the FBI agents 
of fixing the case 
for Hillary Clinton, 
only acknowledging 
several irregularities 
in the email probe,
such as Comey 
drafting a statement 
that exonerated 
Hillary Clinton, 
months before 
FBI agents 
interviewed her.


Horowitz failed 
to demand access 
to James Comey’s 
private Gmail account, 
that he sometimes used 
for official FBI business. 


Read the rest 
of Paul Sperry's