Monday, September 30, 2019

Quid Pro Joe (Biden) -- His Claim That Fired Ukrainian Prosecutor Was Corrupt is a Lie

The Bidens' adventures 
in Ukraine have been known 
for almost four years,
with very little mainstream 
media interest.










In December 2015, 
the New York Times 
published a story saying 
the Ukraine energy company
Burisma hired Hunter Biden 
just weeks after his dad,
Vice President Biden,
was asked by President Obama 

That story alerted Biden’s office 
that Prosecutor General 
Viktor Shokin had an 
active investigation 
of Burisma and its founder.



Biden bragged on a recent video 
that he threatened to withhold 
$1 billion in US loan guarantees 
in 2016, unless Ukraine's 
previous government 
immediately fired Prosecutor 


The Biden threat was a crime.


And the Ukraine prosecutor 
was fired within hours.


The Hill's John Solomon 
found hundreds of documents 
that contradict Joe Biden's 
claim that Ukrainian prosecutor 
Shokin, who was investigating 
his son's employer, was a 


Shokin told Solomon that 
before he got fired, he was
planning to question 
Hunter Biden about $3 million
in fees that he and business 
partner Devon Archer 
had collected from Burisma
 - which in some months 
totaled over $166,000, 
according to documents 
seized by the FBI. 


Joe Biden 
has been peddling 
the narrative 
that Shokin's
March 2016 firing 
had nothing to do 
with Burisma. 

That is a lie.


Shokin says: 
"I was forced out because 
I was leading a wide-range 
corruption probe into
Burisma Holdings, 
a natural gas firm 
active in Ukraine, 
and Joe Biden’s son, 
Hunter, was a member 

Reporter John Solomon claims: 
"Hundreds of pages of 
never-released memos 
and documents — many from 
inside the American team 
helping Burisma 
to stave off its legal troubles 
— conflict with Biden’s narrative."


US officials
"may have painted 
a false picture 
(of Ukraine prosecutor corruption) 
in Ukraine that helped ease 
Burisma’s legal troubles 
and stop prosecutors’ plans 
to interview Hunter Biden 
during the 2016 U.S. 
presidential election."


Burisma’s American legal 
representatives offered 
“an apology for dissemination 
of false information by U.S. 
representatives and public figures” 
smearing the Ukrainian prosecutors, 
according to the Ukrainian 
government’s official memo 
of the meeting. 


Solomon explained: 
"These documents show 
... that the very day Joe Biden 
managed to get that Ukraine 
prosecutor fired ...  the American 
company lawyers helping Burisma 
trying to fight this investigation 
... stated to the replacement 
prosecutor, we know that the 
information calling Mr. Shokin 
corrupt and was ‘False information 
distributed by U.S. Government 
officials and other figures.' "



If the Ukraine prosecutor’s 
firing involved only corruption 
and ineptitude, then why did 
Burisma's American legal team 
refer to those allegations 
as “false information?"

If the firing had nothing to do 
with the Burisma case, 
then why would Burisma’s 
American lawyers contact 
the replacement prosecutor 
within hours of him getting 
the job, and urgently seek 
a meeting in Ukraine 
to discuss the case?



Ukrainian prosecutors 
attempted to get 
this information 
to the US Department 
of Justice (DOJ) 
since last summer - 
first unsuccessfully 
engaging a US attorney 
in New York, who showed 
no interest, and then 
reaching out to Rudy 
Giuliani, President 
Trump's attorney. 


Potential Biden family
financial issues 
in China too:
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-13/not-just-ukraine-biden-may-have-serious-china-problem-schweizer-exposes-hunters-1bn