Monday, August 12, 2019

Actions Against Trump Campaign Overseas Must Be Investigated

Previously in this blog,
concerning foreign 
interference in the 
2016 election:


A small amount 
of claimed interference
that would have favored 
Donald Trump:
(1)
The Russian internet trolls
and $55,000 of poorly worded
Facebook ads, before the election,
were near meaningless,
... obviously unprofessional,
and not done by the Russian 
government.

(2)
The claimed Russian hacking
of the DNC, and transfer of 
hacked e-mails to WikiLeaks,
is a lie, with no evidence.

The alleged "proof" is a 
report paid for by the DNC, 
written by a private company,  
headed by ex-Russians 
who hated Vladimir Putin.



A significant amount
of real interference
that would have favored 
Hillary Clinton:
(1)
The false claim 
of Russian hacking
of the DNC, and Trump's
collusion with Russians,
was used to smear Trump 
during the campaign, 
in spite of the collusion 
being a complete fabrication.

(2)
The Russian lies demeaning 
Trump in the Fusion GPS 
"Trump Dossier",
written by foreign national
Christopher Steele, and
paid for by the Clinton campaign,
were used to justify an
FBI investigation of the Trump
campaign, starting in July
2016, including an unknown
number of wire taps, 
and a FISA warrant for 
at least one Trump
advisor, Carter Page.  





New information:
House Intelligence Committee 
Representative Devin Nunes
says what should be investigated 
is the FBI’s (and CIA's) actions 
overseas interfering with the
Trump campaign in 2016.

The FBI had informants 
spying on the campaign. 

They targeted volunteers 
Carter Page, George 
Papadopolous, and others, 
who traveled outside the U.S.

Once they were overseas, 
the FBI received information 
from informants to dig up
"dirt" on Trump 
during the campaign.

The details of what actually 
took place remain murky.




At the University of Cambridge 
in London, ‘Cambridge Intelligence 
Seminar,’ FBI employees made 
successful attempts in contacting 
members with the  Trump campaign 
in 2016, including Carter Page
and Papadopolous.

DOJ investigators t
need to know 
whether it was 
the FBI or CIA, 
or both, 
that lined up 
confidential sources 
to deliberately contact 
the Trump campaign.

CIA head John Brennan 
briefed Harry Reid 
on the "Trump Dossier"
in August 2016. 

He never briefed Paul Ryan,
Republican Speaker 
of the House at the time.





John Durham’s investigation 
is looking into Professor 
Joseph Mifsud, who made 
direct contact with Papadopolous. 

Mifsud shared information 
with the campaign volunteer 
suggesting the Kremlin 
had the missing Hillary Clinton 
e-mails during the  2016 campaign. 

This claim is missing from 
former Special Counsel 
Robert Mueller’s hatchet job
"report".

Mueller’s report contends 
that Papadopolous' contact 
with Mifsud was the reason
the bureau initiated 
their investigation 
into the Trump campaign 
at the end of July, 2016.

The FBI named 
the investigation 
‘Crossfire Hurricane'.

The task of investigating 
actions of the FBI and CIA 
overseas falls to DOJ 
appointed prosecutor 
John Durham, 
the U.S. attorney 
in Connecticut, and 
Justice Department
Inspector General 
Michael Horowitz.

Durham is believed to be
questioning senior CIA 
personnel, according to 
a recent New York Times 
report.




Former Cambridge Professor 
Stefan Halper was outed 
as an informant for the FBI.

Currently, Finance Committee 
Chairman Chuck Grassley 
is investigating financing 
that was provided 
by the Department of 
Defense’s Office 
of Net Assessment 
to Halper.

Halper's connections to the CIA 
and FBI are extensive, and he 
had been awarded multiple contracts 
with the DOD totaling $411,000 
by Washington Headquarters 
Services -- contracts that ran 
until this March, 2018, 
according to USASpending.gov.