The (anti) "Trump Dossier" is about a US political party (Democrats) buying information from a hostile power (Russia) for fake stories to slam a domestic opponent.
This is an old tactic in US politics (false) stories about an opponent.
The Trump dossier was manufactured by Democrats.
Democrats paid a Washington D.C. law firm, to pay a D.C. “research” firm, to pay a retired British spy, to pay unknown, unidentified Russians to tell tall tales about Mr. Trump.
It did not seem to matter to the Democrats whether the stories were true.
Journalists are presumed to know their sources -- they didn't here.
Democrats paid a long chain of surrogates for sensational claims ... from anonymous agents in Russia ... a country whose spies have a worldwide reputation for clever disinformation.
Leftist-biased media coverage on "Russian Collusion" claims were that various members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russian operatives after being told they had damaging information on Hillary Clinton
... but they never got anything, because no such information existed, and they never paid anyone a penny.
We already know Hillary's campaign paid for the Trump Dossier.
The sources listed in the dossier, allegedly based in Russia, include a "senior Kremlin official".
Fusion GPS, hired by Hillary and the DNC, may have paid American journalists to spread the Russian collusion story, which this blog said a year ago was a myth.
The dossier was written as a series of 18 memos by former British spy Christopher Steele.
The DOJ was required to investigate the Trump campaign, based on nothing more than a series of Russian collusion rumors, and a year later we have no evidence of a crime -- not that "collusion" is a crime, unless money or other bribes were involved.
Why no Special Prosecutor to investigate the Hillary campaign collusion with Russians to write the fake Trump Dossier?
Donald Trump is not the colluding type.
He is a "one man band".
